PDA

View Full Version : Defining Force


Epsilon=One
07-26-2006, 02:29 AM
Defining force

There are many forms of force; and, there are many definitions of force.

All forces have two common conditions:
1.) A force must "push" against whatever it is acting upon; and,
2.) There is an equal and opposite reaction to every force.........

However, there is only a single fundamental force (FF) from which all other forces, in some manner, evolve.

FF has one definition and one source. The motion of FF is inseparable from its source . . . Infinity (http://www.CQthus.com/PT/Infinity).

The further that secondary forces are from the source of FF, the weaker the secondary force is.

The strength of a force from its source is defined by the Inverse Square Law (http://www.CQthus.com/PT/ISL), which is a manifestation of the elliptical geometry of a Pulsoid (http://www.CQthus.com/PT/Pulsoids). Examples of secondary forces, in order of strength are: the strong interaction, the weak interaction, ejected Resoloids (http://www.Resoloid.com) (photons), and some components of gravity (some other components of gravity are further removed from fundamental forces).

Until seminal motion (http://www.CQthus.com/PT/SM) oscillates it is pure motion without dimensions.

Fundamental Force (FF) is Seminal motion (http://www.CQthus.com/PT/SM) that oscillates.

Why seminal motion (http://www.CQthus.com/PT/SM) oscillates; and why those oscillations evolve to all that exists can be visualized by imagining the unique, complex motion that emerges between the separation of a dimensionless point within a dimensionless sphere (S→←P→←S) (respectively, the infinitesimal and the infinite). Such a separation, ultimately, must manifest as a near infinite quantity of Pulsoids (http://www.CQthus.com/PT/Pulsoids).

It is the tangle, harmony, resonance, pulsation, interactions, and reactions of the motion of S→←P→←S that manifests as Reality (http://www.CQthus.com/PT/Reality).

Seminal motion (http://www.CQthus.com/PT/SM) begins as quaquaversal motion and evolves to seminal force when it begins to oscillate, when it is then referred to as Triquametric motion (http://www.CQthus.com/PT/TM) that is the force that creates the seminal quanta and its components.

The oscillation of seminal motion (http://www.CQthus.com/PT/SM) involves slide, swing, and vibration, which evolves to a pulsating, rotational, dual elipsoidal (emergent ellipsoid (http://www.EmergentEllipse.com)), energy "field."

Seminal quanta are analogous to quantum "fields" that are referred to as the Pulsoids (http://www.CQthus.com/PT/Pulsoids) of Pulsoid Theory. (http://www.CQthus.com/PT/OV)

The variations, or anomalies, of the dispersion of seminal motion is the result of its inseparable connection to its source that manifests in an "elastic-like" manner that creates the actions and geometry of Pulsoids (http://www.CQthus.com/PT/Pulsoids), which manifest as all the phenomena of existence . . . Reality. (http://www.CQthus.com/PT/Reality)

The source of seminal motion (http://www.CQthus.com/PT/SM) is referred to as Infinity. (http://www.CQthus.com/PT/Infinity)

The many definitions of secondary forces, which are the forces that are defined or used in the Standard Models of physics, are all dependent upon terms, components and/or concepts, some of which are: mass, speed, acceleration, angular momentum, numbers, squares and other mathematical manipulations, that are far more advanced in evolution than is FF itself.

The illusion of gravity's attraction-at-a-distance is a result of several different manifestations of FF.

Attraction-at-a distance, not only violates the principle that a force must "push" against its object, but, "attraction" can hardly be a single force; as, "attraction" in the manner of gravity's illusion would require mutual: reaching, grabbing, and pulling, which would amount to six forces for two bodies.

Sorry! This Thread is only partially completed.

Please Bookmark and return to this site often.

If there is an immediate need for information,
please e-mail directly at the below "Click" link.

Every effort will be made to expedite a reply
with the requested information.Please ask questions. :)

With questions it’s possible to know if
comments are logical and convincing;
or whether clarification is required.

......http://www.g2d.us/ws.gifhttp://www.g2d.us/s.gifhttp://www.g2d.us/t.gifhttp://www.g2d.us/m.jpg

ste
04-27-2007, 11:40 AM
Why must force be only a push? Why not a lift, or pull? Why is gravity's attraction at a distance not a fundamental force? How is momentum defined?

Epsilon=One
04-27-2007, 03:24 PM
Why must force be only a push? Why not a lift, or pull?You are somewhat correct. The concepts are interrelated; the saliency is that push/pull/lift (a form of pull) are all in direct physical contact with the object.

Though, push is more fundamental than lift/pull; as, lift/pull requires some sort of attachment or grasp before they are actionable. In this manner, conventional gravity, as defined, by academia is actually six forces: two each of reach, grasp, and pull.

Why is gravity's attraction at a distance not a fundamental force?For many reasons. It is not defined. Its illusion is the result of many different forces. It is described by Standard Model theory as not touching its object. It is metaphysical (indescribable).

How is momentum defined?See any dictionary.1. force or speed of movement; impetus, as of a physical object or course of events: The car gained momentum going downhill. Her career lost momentum after two unsuccessful films.
2. Also called linear momentum. Mechanics. a quantity expressing the motion of a body or system, equal to the product of the ma ss of a body and its velocity, and for a system equal to the vector sum of the products of ma ss and velocity of each particle in the system.