Mr. Robin Parsons
07-24-2006, 03:37 PM
© Mr. Robin Parsons :cool: Kingston Ontario Canada MMVI
So A Short 'Math' lesson before we go?
Your Natural Limits of the well, zero and One, we start at 'zero' (the somewhere beneath your feet) the Beginning, and we proceed halfway towards One, Our Goal! Now, we measure the remaining distance 1/2 divide by 2 = 1/4 and proceed that farther forwards to (3/4's of the way there...) towards Our Goal! (one!), now we take the distance remaining, 1/4 move Half of that Distance Forwards, or 1/8'th and we arrive at 7/8'ths of the way THERE!!, now we take the remaining distance 1/16'th and Divide that By 'Half' (or 'two' or '2') and move that far CLOSER to our Goal....Xenocrate Principal will now allow us to Venture Beyond our Ability to Physically Measure...anything, and for as long as (the Function/actiontaken of/is) = (n + 1) because the action finds no limit, yet the Limit is there in Physical reality...
To think that you would go to something outside of yourself (to 'one'...over there) is Completely Against what Infinite is, as it is In/Un-conceivable, ergo: there is *NO image available* ....not a thought nor a 'Point' or what a thought actually is a "Sensation" in your Brain.
Mathematics is a Language, as such it too have abilities to describe, jut that, as is demonstrable, its' ability to describe has descriptive ability that Does Not Describe the real and/as Actual, Physical matter & energies at play/Interplay.
Simple the Concept of Zero well, it's the Start Point, but something is there realistically where you stand, but zero as the Absence of Something describes something that Doesn't exist, and there is a Logic to that too, (as a 'BlackHole' {A site wherein background light is Also being removed} in Space shows) BUT it's Application can be abused ...well it really isn't the Math that "Fools" but it can be used by a 'Human' and they can therein Fool themselves sorta, in certain Manners, the need for reference begetting the Teaching of 'Potential Gravitational Energy' when the Reality is it is 'Actual Gravitational Energy' that is creating the 'Rest State' Status we use Zero, but it is a Misnomer of reality if the Thoughts follow that as real ...just because of the Math Method/Language.
No Delineation of Space means it cannot be Drawn, or Imaged, and/or in infinite 'speak' (mindspace) 'Conceived of'
If you don't believe that 'symmetry' in the Universe is Asymmetrical, go Look in a Mirror ....when you can see it(?) you can walk ..away otherwise, keep looking ...but please don't 'bang your head' on it.
So ...on to this Guy "Banging his head" on a Brick wall...
-------
The complex oscillations of "strings" is a premise that should not be taken lightly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- It appears that you agree with many of my premises; I must point out that supersymmetry is incorporated into many of the Standard Models that I rail against; and, which I thought, apparently mistakenly, that you supported. "Many"?? Where?
Fundamental motion which subsequently becomes the fundamental forces is perfectly symmetrical. and your evidence of that is?? None
Thus, it would be correct to say that all nature evolves from symmetry. Only since you have assumed yourself right...
The usual example of symmetry breaking: "a spherical mass balanced on a point falls asymmetrically" is more an example of uncertainty than symmetry breaking. No More like Gravity.
It could be said that the spherical mass follows the "uncertainty" of symmetry; all fundamental nature begins with the symmetry of emergent seminal motion that is comparable to that motion which would arise from the separation of a dimensionless point within a dimensionless sphere; however, diversity begins when this symmetry becomes ellipsoidal in the formation of the Inverse Square Law, dimensions, and seminal quanta. dimensionless point thats imaginary, completely Imaginary, it does not exist other then as a 'thought' in-YOUR-BRain.
Most symmetry breaking concepts result from not understanding the complex harmony and resonances of symmetrical ellipsoids."It's all there fault cause they don't understand it all the way you do" ....as opposed to ...what? Symmetry breaking has been observed?
Of course, the concept of symmetry breaking depends upon the precise definition of how asymmetry is defined. However, my point is that Nature begins with perfect symmetry and subsequent symmetry breaking manifestations are that we imperfectly understand the subsequent harmonics and resonances of fundamental symmetry.Your Route of the 'Perfect' Creating this Asymmetrical "Imperfection" ...there is a Way, just that that is not it....
It is interesting to note that Pulsoid Theory rationalizes all the known objections that you raise concerning string theory and its offshoots (ST) as well as the enigmas presented by supersymmetry (SUSY).Your theory "rationalizes all of the know objections" that (I) raised??? HUH?? What?? Where...?? no Where, thats where....
A caveat: SUSY is one of the most important theories of conventional physics; it comes very, very close to explaining the micro environment; closer than any other rationalization; however, it is almost useless in attempting to explain current Cosmological enigmas.That is the Most Beautifully Contrived self contradiction that (I) have probably EVERrrr read.
The complex oscillations of string like phenomena is a premise that should not be taken lightly. A major problem of ST is that it is trying to reconcile Standard Model forces that are metaphysical. If Metaphysical then they are beyond the reach of Science as Science only follows the real And testable (Solids/sorta/liquidandgasthats'why) as 'tangible' to even a meter such as a Geiger Counter or television Antenna
(Premature??)
It is premature to reject the portions of existing theory that will become part of the rationalization for a "new physics" paradigm shift.Unless there is Good evidence that they are Not descriptive of 'reality' and if that is what the Answer being saught is as the Math is good crytographic realm
♪ "....Another one bites the dust...." ♪
Pre-mature?
or ...Post-mature?
So A Short 'Math' lesson before we go?
Your Natural Limits of the well, zero and One, we start at 'zero' (the somewhere beneath your feet) the Beginning, and we proceed halfway towards One, Our Goal! Now, we measure the remaining distance 1/2 divide by 2 = 1/4 and proceed that farther forwards to (3/4's of the way there...) towards Our Goal! (one!), now we take the distance remaining, 1/4 move Half of that Distance Forwards, or 1/8'th and we arrive at 7/8'ths of the way THERE!!, now we take the remaining distance 1/16'th and Divide that By 'Half' (or 'two' or '2') and move that far CLOSER to our Goal....Xenocrate Principal will now allow us to Venture Beyond our Ability to Physically Measure...anything, and for as long as (the Function/actiontaken of/is) = (n + 1) because the action finds no limit, yet the Limit is there in Physical reality...
To think that you would go to something outside of yourself (to 'one'...over there) is Completely Against what Infinite is, as it is In/Un-conceivable, ergo: there is *NO image available* ....not a thought nor a 'Point' or what a thought actually is a "Sensation" in your Brain.
Mathematics is a Language, as such it too have abilities to describe, jut that, as is demonstrable, its' ability to describe has descriptive ability that Does Not Describe the real and/as Actual, Physical matter & energies at play/Interplay.
Simple the Concept of Zero well, it's the Start Point, but something is there realistically where you stand, but zero as the Absence of Something describes something that Doesn't exist, and there is a Logic to that too, (as a 'BlackHole' {A site wherein background light is Also being removed} in Space shows) BUT it's Application can be abused ...well it really isn't the Math that "Fools" but it can be used by a 'Human' and they can therein Fool themselves sorta, in certain Manners, the need for reference begetting the Teaching of 'Potential Gravitational Energy' when the Reality is it is 'Actual Gravitational Energy' that is creating the 'Rest State' Status we use Zero, but it is a Misnomer of reality if the Thoughts follow that as real ...just because of the Math Method/Language.
No Delineation of Space means it cannot be Drawn, or Imaged, and/or in infinite 'speak' (mindspace) 'Conceived of'
If you don't believe that 'symmetry' in the Universe is Asymmetrical, go Look in a Mirror ....when you can see it(?) you can walk ..away otherwise, keep looking ...but please don't 'bang your head' on it.
So ...on to this Guy "Banging his head" on a Brick wall...
-------
The complex oscillations of "strings" is a premise that should not be taken lightly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- It appears that you agree with many of my premises; I must point out that supersymmetry is incorporated into many of the Standard Models that I rail against; and, which I thought, apparently mistakenly, that you supported. "Many"?? Where?
Fundamental motion which subsequently becomes the fundamental forces is perfectly symmetrical. and your evidence of that is?? None
Thus, it would be correct to say that all nature evolves from symmetry. Only since you have assumed yourself right...
The usual example of symmetry breaking: "a spherical mass balanced on a point falls asymmetrically" is more an example of uncertainty than symmetry breaking. No More like Gravity.
It could be said that the spherical mass follows the "uncertainty" of symmetry; all fundamental nature begins with the symmetry of emergent seminal motion that is comparable to that motion which would arise from the separation of a dimensionless point within a dimensionless sphere; however, diversity begins when this symmetry becomes ellipsoidal in the formation of the Inverse Square Law, dimensions, and seminal quanta. dimensionless point thats imaginary, completely Imaginary, it does not exist other then as a 'thought' in-YOUR-BRain.
Most symmetry breaking concepts result from not understanding the complex harmony and resonances of symmetrical ellipsoids."It's all there fault cause they don't understand it all the way you do" ....as opposed to ...what? Symmetry breaking has been observed?
Of course, the concept of symmetry breaking depends upon the precise definition of how asymmetry is defined. However, my point is that Nature begins with perfect symmetry and subsequent symmetry breaking manifestations are that we imperfectly understand the subsequent harmonics and resonances of fundamental symmetry.Your Route of the 'Perfect' Creating this Asymmetrical "Imperfection" ...there is a Way, just that that is not it....
It is interesting to note that Pulsoid Theory rationalizes all the known objections that you raise concerning string theory and its offshoots (ST) as well as the enigmas presented by supersymmetry (SUSY).Your theory "rationalizes all of the know objections" that (I) raised??? HUH?? What?? Where...?? no Where, thats where....
A caveat: SUSY is one of the most important theories of conventional physics; it comes very, very close to explaining the micro environment; closer than any other rationalization; however, it is almost useless in attempting to explain current Cosmological enigmas.That is the Most Beautifully Contrived self contradiction that (I) have probably EVERrrr read.
The complex oscillations of string like phenomena is a premise that should not be taken lightly. A major problem of ST is that it is trying to reconcile Standard Model forces that are metaphysical. If Metaphysical then they are beyond the reach of Science as Science only follows the real And testable (Solids/sorta/liquidandgasthats'why) as 'tangible' to even a meter such as a Geiger Counter or television Antenna
(Premature??)
It is premature to reject the portions of existing theory that will become part of the rationalization for a "new physics" paradigm shift.Unless there is Good evidence that they are Not descriptive of 'reality' and if that is what the Answer being saught is as the Math is good crytographic realm
♪ "....Another one bites the dust...." ♪
Pre-mature?
or ...Post-mature?