View Full Version : Advance of Mercury's perihelion (the right solution)
tsolkas
06-25-2006, 01:36 PM
The difference of 43´´/century with astronomic observations as regards the advance of Mercury’s perihelion is not attributed to the curvature of space-time around the Sun, as the Theory of Relativity erroneously maintains.
The 43´´/century of the advance of Mercury’s perihelion (as demonstrated above) are due to the revolution of the Sun around the center of mass of our Solar system, a fact that until today has never been taken into account when calculating the advance of Mercury’s perihelion. Finally, after everything discussed in this paper, the Theory of Relativity should be unquestionably deemed erroneous.
more...http://www.tsolkas.gr/english/document1/proof-perihlion/proof-perihlion.html
Epsilon=One
06-25-2006, 08:08 PM
The difference of 43´´/century with astronomic observations as regards the advance of Mercury’s perihelion is not attributed to the curvature of space-time around the Sun, as the Theory of Relativity erroneously maintains.I agree that the advance of Mercury's perihelion is erroneously explained by GR, which doesn't even agree with observation; however, I also believe an accurate explanation is much more complex than you assert.
Finally, after everything discussed in this paper, the Theory of Relativity should be unquestionably deemed erroneous.With this I cannot agree. True, GR is simplistic; however, it's a triumph of the human mind and a great advance toward an understanding of the environment in which we find ourselves. It is not so easily "put down" as you seem to think.
GR is one step in the right direction towards truth. In the history of humans there have been few steps of such great relevance.
No one understood the fallacies of Relativity Theory better than Einstein. Few paid much attention to his critiques of his work while he lived; and fewer do today. It was never possible for the Big Bang to have become a standard model while he lived. The Big Bang is responsible for most of the misleading concepts of Pomo theoretical physics that has indirectly led to the world's currently enlarging, faith-based culture.
Einstein could never be part of today's Pomo elite theoretical physicists who spend most of their time contriving equations to match experimental results that they seldom can understand. Einstein never needed much technology (or mathematics); he relied on visualization and logic.
ati3414
06-27-2006, 03:44 PM
For years you have been peppering the bulletin boards with your "discoveries".
Well, you got several things wrong:
1. basic astronomy
2. basic celestial mechanics
3. GR interpretation of Mercury's perihelion advancement
In a nutshell, your so called paper is pure junk. A new junk fresh off the press from Christos Tsolkas
vBulletin® v3.6.8, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.