Classical Physics is coming back, RELOADED!!!

[martillo]

Classical Physics is coming back, RELOADED!!!

---> "A New Light In Physics" (http://www.geocities.com/anewlightinphysics)


It worth.

[Epsilon=One]

Classical Physics is coming back, RELOADED!!!

---> "A New Light In Physics" (http://www.geocities.com/anewlightinphysics)I don't believe that Classical Physics will ever be able to explain the macro or micro phenomena of Reality.

I can find nothing in your theory that applies to the reconciliation of the observable effects of gravity or Cosmic Inertia.

That you can relate your "Gravitational Forces" with your other contrived forces as you do in "3.1 The Basic Fields and Forces of Nature" is ludicrous. Gravity is not a "basic" (fundamental) force.

You state the photon has mass. This nice contrivance does qualify it as a force; however, you also state the photon is emitted from its source at a constant speed. This makes it difficult to consider the photon as a force; contrary to observation.

You refer to the photon as "electromagnetic." What is it about the photon that is "electro" or "magnetic," which I relate to fermions and 1/2 spin?

Your theory seems to relie upon manipulation of symbols which are in themselves unproved as anything but symbols; not the Reality that you are trying to describe. Nowhere can I find where you state your descriptions are heuristic.

If you insist on giving your mathematical symbols this kind of power, you must first prove the logic of mathematics in such a way that you can dismiss Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorem.