Cosmic Entanglement

[Epsilon=One]

Cosmic Entanglement (CEn)

Entanglement is the phenomenon used to describe the observation that regardless of where entities (fermions or bosons) exist in the Universe they can affect one another . . . instantly.

Cosmic entanglement (CEn) is analogous to quantum entanglement with emphasis placed upon the entanglement of all manifestations of mass including very large Cosmic bodies. Thus, it is entanglement, both Cosmic and quantum, that is a most salient aspect of the reconciliation of the theories of General Relativity (GR) and Quantum Mechanics (QM).

Entanglement is an observed physical phenomenon that is considered bizarre and "spooky" by all current, academic, theoretical physicists, many of whom consider entanglement as the greatest physical mystery of the 20th century.

Generally, the gravitational effect is not considered as Cosmic entanglement (CEn) because few realize that the speed of "gravity," as the speed between paired photons, is infinite.

Entanglement is a consequence of the seminal process being the same phenomenon from which all the fundamental components of Reality (www.101123.com/R) evolve. The heuristic manifestation of this process is the Pulsoid (www.101123.com/P) of Pulsoid Theory (www.101123.com/PTis).

An example of Cosmic entanglement (CEn) would be the universal gravitational effect as described by Confluent Congruence (www.101123.com/CC) (CC).

Entanglement is a consequence of all physical quanta having hyper-relativistic (www.101123.com/HR) (HR), intrinsic oscillations. Thus, regardless of where a physical quantum may appear to be at one location, its intrinsic motion (slide, swing, and vibration) moves between the limits of the infinitesimal and the infinite, where, at these extremes, there is congruence; i.e. with every pulse of the most fundamental quantum, all quantum are congruent at Infinity (www.101123.com/I).

It is at these hyper-relativistic (www.101123.com/HR) (HR) limits of motion where all phenomena are congruent and interrelated. This interrelationship is at speeds which are not apparent within an environment that is established by phenomena moving at, or below, the speed of light.

It is the phenomenon of hyper-relativistic (www.101123.com/HR) (HR) speeds and consequent entanglement that is responsible for the “observed” phenomenon of non-locality.

©Copyright 2006-2008 by Brunardot. All rights reserved.
Terms: PhysicsMathForums.com, Brunardot, and Pulsoid Theory must be cited.
Sorry! This Thread has not been completed.
Please Bookmark and return to this site often.

If there is an immediate need for information,
please e-mail directly at the below "Click" link.

Please note that any private correspondence
may be edited and anonymously posted unless
requested otherwise.

Every effort will be made to expedite a reply
with the requested information.Please ask questions. :)With questions it’s possible to know if
comments are logical and convincing;
or whether clarification is required......http://1.g2d.us/e.gifhttp://7.g2d.us/e.jpghttp://2.g2d.us/e.gifhttp://3.g2d.us/e.gifhttp://4.g2d.us/e.gifhttp://5.g2d.us/e.gif
..........http://6.g2d.us/e.gif
..........If images don’t display, "click" the Refresh Icon.

[Albers]

Electromagnetism is a polar manifestation at the levels we experience. Gravitation is a lower-scale (by many orders of magnitude) phenomenon which cares not about polar sense. I toyed with the idea of some ultra-high frequency realm in which this is communicated. If there is Planck length, then combined with 'c' there is Planck frequency.

[Epsilon=One]

Electromagnetism is a polar manifestation at the levels we experience. Gravitation is a lower-scale (by many orders of magnitude) phenomenon which cares not about polar sense.To begin: I have little tolerance for the term “electromagnetism” as neither electricity nor magnetism are physically defined and neither has anything to do with “electromagnetic” waves of Light.

The term “electromagnetism” is a combination of words that are used for phenomena that is not understood; something like the terms: gravity, light, weak force, and strong force. These terms are akin to metaphysical gods to explain forces of nature like Zeus, et cetera.

Now with that said; I have no quibble with Light as a polar manifestation. Maybe a bit too general (because it relies on mathematical interpretation rather than explanation of "Why?"); but, polar manifestation is OK because it is descriptive beyond mathematical symbolism.

Now, your impression of gravity is another matter. Everything that has to do with gravity is fundamentally polar. (Remember it is gravity that is the force of galactic recession. It is gravity's polarity that accounts for its acceleration. See: Relative, Hierarchic Compression (http://www.physicsmathforums.com/showthread.php?t=124) and Confluent Congruence (http://www.physicsmathforums.com/showthread.php?t=123).) Gravity may appear at the anthropic level to be “lower-scale” in force; though, fundamentally gravity is of a much higher order than other forms of force; as, gravity does not begin to manifest until well into evolution . . . after radiant energy morphs to a state of total internal reflection.

I toyed with the idea of some ultra-high frequency realm in which this is communicated. If there is Planck length, then combined with 'c' there is Planck frequency.There is “some ultra-high frequency realm.” See: Quantitative Proof of Pulsoid Theory (http://physicsmathforums.com/showthread.php?t=195)

I don’t like the term “Planck length” because it is contrived with no explanation of “Why?”; I prefer Conceptual Unit (http://www.physicsmathforums.com/showthread.php?t=322) (CU).

Yes there is a fundamental frequency that all phenomena is tuned to that is related to fundamental, intrinsic time..

[Albers]

I used to co-own land with a man who became ashamed of our 'hippie' roots. We came to Oregon country from the suburbs, and did it truly communally on forty acres for ten-twelve years. As babies became older it became clear we needed to separate more. This happened with more or less harmony. After another ten years, I heard this man trying to deny his and my past, to shame it. I told him to shut up. We did beautiful things as naked hippies, like learn to build houses, learning to farm, etc. I am proud of my past: we lived on my hydraulic ram pump for a few years. That was then and this is now. I do not appreciate your denigration of the concepts which got you to this point. Perhaps you have not wound enough electromagnets and made your own motors. You put all this down as engineering. I know a man who has a fascinating theory on protons, and he is a 60-yr old English major and raconteur in general. He got me started six years ago. I can no longer speak with him, though, because he has the mentality of a 7-8-year old. Anything he does not know how to handle he trashes.. This is the height of ignorance. I understand that you think you see further, and I want to see what you see. Your friend, Norm Albers

[Albers]

Yup. Money takes many forms. Pennies are important toa 5-yr-old. Quarters matter when you're, maybe 7. At 10, dollars; at 16, twenties. Then your money takes the form of a check account. Paper signifies exchange. When you are a decade or two older, larger bank notes are exchanged, and different instruments of investment, etc. Up into the millions of dollars the expression becomes appropriate to this regime. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Do you see? It is so about energy. Now consider the Lorentz-transformed electron at high speed. The field strength in the transverse dir. is multiplied by gamma, and reduced by gamma-squared in the long. dir. If indeed there are whirl-a-gigs involving these entities, the magnitude of force between them is at least several magnitudes greater than usually experienced. VOILA, THE STRONG FORCE. THE ONLY DISUNIFIED THING AROUND HERE IS US. Do you know "whirl-a-gigs" is used by Shakespeare?!!!!

[Epsilon=One]

It is so about energy. Now consider the Lorentz-transformed electron at high speed. The field strength in the transverse dir. is multiplied by gamma-squared, and reduced by gamma in the long. dir.The “field” strength would seem to be a function of ellipsoidal geometry

If indeed there are whirl-a-gigs involving these entities, the magnitude of force between them is at least several magnitudes greater than usually experienced. VOILA, THE STRONG FORCE.There is only one force (that of seminal motion) that manifests, anthropically, in a variety of forms.

The strong force is so, because of its proximity to its source.

[Albers]

Proximity and revolution, or some rotation. Like I suggest in "3" is a magic number, something is going around in a mode of three's.

[Epsilon=One]

I am proud of my past…As any hippie should be. I lived off the land throughout the Sioux Lookout and the Quetico; then, Northern Wisconsin. While in school, I lived as a hippie before the term was coined.

I do not appreciate your denigration of the concepts… (that)You put…down as engineering.I highly admire engineers and research scientists of all stripes. It is the pomo theoretical physicist that I disdain.

Anything he does not know how to handle he trashes.. This is the height of ignorance.I agree. Justifiable hubris requires wisdom.

I understand that you think you see further…Yes, but when fundamental concepts are concerned, few other persons would agree.

[Epsilon=One]

Proximity and revolution, or some rotation. Like I suggest in "3" is a magic number, something is going around in a mode of three's.You are absolutely right. And, the threes in fours; or, vice versa.

[Albers]

Cool. <a,a,b>, <a,b,b> . My dream here is to show fundamental half-wave tinkertoys. Along with vertex rules, this could be a fine toy. . .unless Gell-Mann already did it.

[Epsilon=One]

My dream here is to show fundamental half-wave tinkertoys. Along with vertex rules, this could be a fine toy. . .unless Gell-Mann already did it.No, Murray has been inactive, of late, on the theoretical scene.

The solitons, as they are described by Pulsoid Theory (www.CQthus.com/PT/PT), should be the "fundamental half-wave tinkertoys" that you seek.

And, the "vertex rules" that you seek are, probably, found within the geometric formation of Dynamic, Hyper-relativistic Vectors (www.CQthus.com/PT/DHV) (DHV) that form from Dynamic Emergent Separation (www.CQthus.com/PT/DS) (DES); and, which are analogous to the "strings" of String Theory (ST).

[ste]

You have mentioned Confluent Congruence as an example of Cosmic Entanglement. Are there any other visible effects seen between massive macroscopic bodies?

[Epsilon=One]

You have mentioned Confluent Congruence as an example of Cosmic Entanglement. Are there any other visible effects seen between massive macroscopic bodies?What are you looking for that is beyond the entire fine-tuned, ellipsoidal (with time helical) motion of all elements within the Cosmos and the internal effects of compresion on all of said elements?