Aether Wave Theory [Archive] - Physics Forums: Physics, Astronomy, Math, & Philosophy Forums!

Zephir

03-01-2006, 02:43 PM

The main introducing point in the Aether Wave Theory (http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtopic=2787) as the semi-qualitative TOE theory is:

The observable Universe is composed from the waves of massive environment, the evolution of which can be computed recursively using wave equation for string as modular form, where the mass density of string corresponds the total energy density of the wave motion (i.e. the sum of the potential and kinetic energy of this motion). The one-step solution of such modular form leads to the Schrodinger equation known from quantum mechanic.

I believe, from this relation is possible to derive all the other insights, which I've presented during time, for example:

1) The evolution both the observable mass, both the biosphere and human civilization can be described by the recursive wave equation with generalized terms for time, energy potential and space. From this point of view the "Aether" is the common metaphysical denominator for such evolutionary environment.

2) The gravity is formed by the Casimir force between gravitons. Here is not principal difference between behavior of vacuum and other massive environments, based on the surface energy spreading in transversal waves. It enables to explain the c=const postulate, the twins paradox and other relativity effects. All they have a Rayleigh wave spreading analogies in the real world (strings, water surface waves).

3) The Universe is formed by the dense elastic foam recursively, the inertial torsion deformations with the spinor components are creating both the particles composing the massive vacuum, both the particles of the observable matter. Nearly no mass/energy density is required for the formation of Universe, but the origin of the initial Aether inertia required for the subsequent compactification of it is uncertain.

4) The energy spreading in inhomogeneous vacuum is forming a path for the subsequent energy spreading due the minimization of action principle(autofocusation effect for energy spreading through it's own gradient, similar to the negative refraction index materials). This leads to the autofocusation of the energy waves to the form of energy wave pockets (i.e. bosons) by the gravity lens mechanism of the subsequent energy density field and finally to the formation of particles due the total reflection effect.

5) The same effect (compactification of space and particle formation) can be described from the GR point of view as the process of spontaneous symmetry breaking (i.e. the oscillating vortices formation inside the superfluid vacuum with supercritical energy density. Such fluid is formed by such vortices (i.e. torsion deformation of it) at the same time. This model explains the supersymmetry as the process of the formation of fermions from bosons recursively.

6) The formation of new space-time metric is limited by the minimization of action principle (i.e. the surface area/volume ratio) by the similar way, as the surface hypersphere with the infimum around 6D convolution level. This explains the stability of the 6D vacuum, which is forming the major (most massive) part of observable Universe.

7) Above the 6D space convolution level, the gravity force becomes repulsive, being the source of non-Abelian deformations inside the particles. Above the 12 D the space time becomes flat, forming a new multidimensional "emptiness" for the subsequent formation of the daughter Universe (so called singularity). Such process can be both adiabatic, both steady state.

8) The vacuum can be described by the 6D fluid composed from 3D particles, the torsion deformation of which are mutually connected in so called particle generations. The 3D is the minimal convolution level required for repulsive charge of such particles, this explains the number of dimensions of observable space.

9) The Aether phase transitions leads to the formation of the hidden dimensions set in process of so called inflation, similar to the condensation of the supercritical vapor. The Universe doesn't expand from the perspective of observer outside of such environment, but is making more dense, instead. The dark energy is simple gravity effect, corresponding to the compactification acceleration of the collapsars.

10) The observable mass is adiabatically cooled metastable phase, forming during the inflation as the result of shock waves collisions, leading to the quasar formations. These object are metastable, exploding to the radiation and cooling, during this the foams of the observable matter and antimatter are formed. The most of antimatter is contained in the so called dark matter (i.e. vacuum fluctuations with the low convolution levels)

11) The black holes cannot by formed by accretion, because the limit of its spontaneous formation is much more higher than Chandrasekhar's limit, but as the rest of quasars, instead. They're behaving like the neutrino stars, part of mass of it is unaccessible form outside due the space-time compactification inside it (negative gravity). The observation of the mass limit of such BH can serve as the indirect indicia for content of adiabatic singularities, i.e. daughter universes.

Etc, see my former submissions for the other insights, leading from the Aether Wave hypothesis. I believe. they're quite consistent, but please don't expect, you'll understand everything at the first moment without some practical physic background/explanation, which is collected in my former posts to the physorg.com forum. You can search/browse it using simple off-line OpenSource application (http://superstruny.aspweb.cz/images/fyzika/PhysOrg.zip).

Have fun with understanding of the main principles of our Universe.

Epsilon=One

06-27-2006, 11:11 PM

The main introducing point in the Aether Wave Theory (http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtopic=2787) as the semi-qualitative TOE theory is:...I cannot believe that PhysOrg tolerates such gobbledygook as Aether Wave Theory (AWT). Most every numbered paragraph is internally inconsistent and irreconcilable with any of the other paragraphs.

The ridiculousness of AWT is too widespread and unsupported to even try to isolate a point to dispute.

Why don’t you attempt to make a “single” non-standard model point that you can support with logic and observation (scientific method is not important at this juncture); I’ll attempt critiquing it, and other continuing concepts as we progress, until there is a consensus. At present, there is nothing more than unsupported, obfuscating gobbledygook that relies heavily on mainline enigmas and paradoxes that you do little to illuminate.

How ‘bout a simple definition of time or the source of mathematics. Until you can understand time and a proof of mathematics, even "semi-qualitative" TOE is a bit much.

Your effort is appreciated. It's your techniques and conclusions that leave much to be desired. To paraphrase several laureates, "A theory isn't worth much until the barmaid/layman has a chance at understanding it."