Once again about Diogenes.

[socratus]

They say that Diogenes illuminated faces of passers- by with his lantern
when there was bright light, speaking that he is searching for a man.
I am - Diogenes.
I search for the person.
I search for the reasonable person and to each I set a question:
“ Listen! Speed of a light quantum in Vacuum is a constant,
maximum, absolute quantity !
Why does everyone say that there is no absolute speed of motion?
The speed of this light quantum is absolute only in Vacuum,
in absolute Vacuum !
Why does everyone say that there is no absolute reference system? ”
Diogenes sets a question, and nobody can understand him, as always, in all times.
I realize a reason of this bewilderment.
You see nobody perceives, what is VACUUM.
You see nobody perceives, what is a Quantum of light.
http://www.socratus.com

[socratus]

Mr. B. wrote:
If you are looking for support, at most you will find paranoid
and/or confused individuals who want to take shelter in your
us-vs.-them state of mind.

Who is who?
=================....
1.
The speed of Light quantum is constant: c=1,
no matter how the source or the observer moves.
/ Michelson’s experiment. 1881. SRT. 1905. /
2.
But .. .. in every book and textbook is written that
there isn’t absolute speed. For example in the book
“ Relative theory- actual” by Prof. Ernst Schmutzer.
Part 3.2.2.page 122. and
Part 3.2.4. page 130.

Another book “Relativity for the layman”
By James A. Coleman.
Part 3 pages 47 -48

Another book “The materialistic essence of Einstein’s
Relative theory” by Mostepanenko M. B.
Page 37.

Another book “ Einstein and development of physical/
mathematical thought.” by Science Academy of
USSR. Article “ Physics and Relative theory”
by M. Born. On the pages 74 and 81.
And article “ Relative theory and some questions
about the optic of moving bodies” by Francfurt U. I.
and Frenk A.M. Page 224: “ Relative theory
doesn’t know absolute moving”.
etc….
3.
From the school days I cannot understand how
it is possible to say that the speed of photon is
absolute constant c=1 and in the same time to say :
“ All motion is relative (hence ,the theory of relativity).
We can never speak of absolute motion as such,…..”
…etc.
Maybe somebody can explain me this paradox.
==========..
It is very difficult to prove the correctness
in our Orwell's mad house.

====================...
Best wishes.
Israel.

[Ìistikz]

youre not imagining things. I read that post about Adam as well, so it was definitely there although I dont remember who wrote it, but Ill take your word it was Jenn.

[Thymn]

DANG-DANG

GIA was one of a kind and always a nice guy.
He will surely be missed

You always have a friend in Columbus Ohio
All the best to you and your family GIA

Mitch

[pjakesmith]

Thanks for the post!