View Full Version : The Conceptual Unit
Epsilon=One
12-20-2005, 05:53 PM
The Conceptual Unit (CU)
The Conceptual Unit (CU) is a resonance phenomenon that remains constant at all scales from the smallest quanta of space and time to the largest Cosmic measurements. The Conceptual Unit is not affected by relative speeds or acceleration from the “slow” anthropic environment to that of hyper-relativistic speeds of the subatomic and Cosmic environment.
The CU is at the center of understanding the concepts of space, time, speed, and acceleration.
The CU is heuristically described by the geometry of the Elliptical Constant (www.101123.com/EC) (EC).
The CU measures one “tick” of the Universal Clock that is intrinsic to all phenomena. The first “tick” is a function of seminal motion (www.101123.com/SM) (SM) often referred to as “dark” energy (www.101123.com/DE); subsequent “ticks” are a function of the resonance produced by the complex oscillations of Triquametric motion (www.101123.com/TM).
The CU is the smallest discrete manifestation that is the common denominator of the complex oscillations from which all phenomena evolves including not only life, but all anthropic perceptions. Thus, the CU can be considered, at once, as the simplest and most complex of all concepts.
The CU measures the time of seminal motion's (www.101123.com/SM) pulse and all subsequent Pulsoidal (www.101123.com/P) pulses; thus establishing the radius of the smallest quantity of three-dimensional, orthogonal space, which is the simplest resonance phenomenon; while also controlling the direction and “flow” of time for the fundamental frequencies of the Cosmos.
The CU, as physically the “time” of the seminal pulse, also establishes the phenomenon of expanding, relativistic, spatial dimensions . . . or space itself that is observed as accelerating, galactic recession. The seminal pulse is ellipsoidally quaquaversal; thus the CU, which is a unit of time measurement, establishes the fundamental unit (common denominator) of spatial dimensions as the spherical radius of said seminal pulse at the first “tick” of time's “clock.”
The speed (space/time) of fundamental motion is measured as multiples of the CU. These multiples are established by subsequent, ellipsoidal pulses which are controlled by an “escapement” effect, which is the resultant of spinning, spherical resonances that evolve and dissipate with each hyper-relativistic pulse.
The spherical resonances of Triquametric motion (www.101123.com/TM) are heuristically described by the geometry of the ellipsoid; and, particularly, two-dimensionally, as the geometry of the Elliptical Constant (www.101123.com/EC) and the sequences of the Brunardot Series (www.101123.com/BS).
©Copyright 2005-2008 by Brunardot. All rights reserved.
Terms: PhysicsMathForums, Brunardot, and Pulsoid Theory must be cited.
Sorry! This Thread has not been completed.
Please Bookmark and return to this site often.
If there is an immediate need for information,
please e-mail directly at the below "Click" link.
Please note that any private correspondence
may be edited and anonymously posted unless
requested otherwise.
Every effort will be made to expedite a reply
with the requested information.Please ask questions. :)With questions it’s possible to know if
comments are logical and convincing;
or whether clarification is required......http://1.g2d.us/e.gifhttp://7.g2d.us/e.jpghttp://2.g2d.us/e.gifhttp://3.g2d.us/e.gifhttp://4.g2d.us/e.gifhttp://5.g2d.us/e.gif
..........http://6.g2d.us/e.gif
..........If images don’t display, "click" the Refresh Icon.
The CU measures the time of seminal motion's pulse and subsequent Pulsoidal pulses; thus establishing the radius of the smallest quantity of three dimensional space, which is the simplest resonance phenomenon; while also controlling the direction and “flow” of time for the fundamental frequencies of the Cosmos.
When you say that CU measures the time of seminal motion's pulse, do you mean it's period of pulsation? Is the pulsating even a periodical phenomena? How does direction and "flow" of time affect our perception of matter (If, as you stated earlier, light is an illusion of the existence of particles)?
The speed (space/time) of fundamental motion is measured as multiples of the CU. These multiples are established by subsequent, ellipsoidal pulses which are controlled by an “escapement” effect, which is the resultant of spinning, spherical resonances.
If the CU is a measurment of time, as you stated above, what is the unit for measurment of space in a space/time equation?
Epsilon=One
10-13-2006, 08:25 AM
When you say that CU measures the time of seminal motion's pulse, do you mean it's period of pulsation?Yes (frequency). And, also its increase in length along the major diameter (wave length). And, proportionally, its "red-shift" along the minor diameter. Also, quite importantly, its deceleration.
How does direction and "flow" of time affect our perception of matter (If, as you stated earlier, light is an illusion of the existence of particles)?I can't see how it does. Of course, perceptions can vary.
What was the context when I stated, "light is an illusion of the existence of particles"? I understand various "states" of Light; and I'm not certain if you are quoting concerning "Light" or "light"; or, what its state may have been. Or, maybe. I was just jabbering . . .
If the CU is a measurment of time, as you stated above, what is the unit for measurment of space in a space/time equation?I can't accept the usual meaning of spacetime. I understand the orthogonal dimensions and time as quite distinct; and, I do not consider that "space" warps.
"Units" are contrivances; though necessary; what is important is that the CU remains constant. Space consists of quanta, which are subject to pressure deformation such that measurement would be complex; though, for the most part, the differences would probably be of little consequence within large local areas.
It would be very difficult to think of space as other than quanta, no matter what your philosophy may be. See: Dyosphere (http://www.Dyosphere.com).
What IS a "Tick"? In what fashion is a "Tick" measured? What can be measured in terms of the conceptual unit? How so?
How can the Conceptual Unit be used to describe things such as space, time, speed, and acceleration?
Epsilon=One
03-23-2007, 08:02 AM
What IS a "Tick"? In what fashion is a "Tick" measured? What can be measured in terms of the conceptual unit? How so?A "Tick" ocurrs when all possible vectors of the separation of a dimensionless point within a dimensionless sphere (www.CQthus.com/PT/DHV) are in an arrangement such that all salient structural parts of the manifestation are multiples of a common denominator, the Elliptical Constant (www.CQthus.com/PT/EC) (EC). When these "integers" occur there is a harmony that creates resonances (Resoloids (www.Resoloid.com)) that stop/transfer the energy of the pulse for a moment. This moment is the "Tick" of fundamental, intrinsic time (www.CQthus.com/PT/Clock) (FIT) that tunes the entire Universe to a single harmony.
The Conceptual Unit (heuristically, the Elliptical Constant (www.CQthus.com/PT/EC)) is analogous to the Planck Unit from which all units of all Natural systems are derived.
How can the Conceptual Unit be used to describe things such as space, time, speed, and acceleration?See above statement.
A "Tick" ocurrs when all possible vectors of the separation of a dimensionless point within a dimensionless sphere are in an arrangement such that all salient structural parts of the manifestation are multiples of a common denominator, the Elliptical Constant (EC). When these "integers" occur there is a harmony that creates resonances (Resoloids) that stop/transfer the energy of the pulse for a moment. This moment is the "Tick" of fundamental, intrinsic time (FIT) that tunes the entire Universe to a single harmony.
Quite a fascinating picture. The processes which you describe that occur on a hyper-relativistic level seem to make sense, as far as logic is concerned. But since we cannot see them directly, they require a certain ammount of faith to believe in. Is there no way to reconcile these happenings with that which is directly observable, thus mitigating the ammout of faith needed to believe in the existence of resoloids, dimensionless spheres, and other hyper-relativistic occurrences?
The Conceptual Unit (heuristically, the Elliptical Constant) is analogous to the Planck Unit from which all units of all Natural systems are derived.
How are the units derived, then? How can speed, for example, be represented using the CU?
Epsilon=One
03-23-2007, 06:49 PM
Quite a fascinating picture. The processes which you describe that occur on a hyper-relativistic level seem to make sense, as far as logic is concerned.It is more than just logic; it is logic, all observation, and scientific method . . . in fact it is IPSO (www.CQthus.com/PT/IPSO).
But since we cannot see them directly, they require a certain ammount of faith to believe in. Is there no way to reconcile these happenings with that which is directly observable, thus mitigating the ammout of faith needed to believe in the existence of resoloids, dimensionless spheres, and other hyper-relativistic occurrences?Your question indicates that you do not understand the Elliptical Constant (www.CQthus.com/PT/EC). Can you explain the EC in a sentence or two so that I can get a handle on what you do understand about the EC?
How are the units derived, then?See the above comment.
How can speed, for example, be represented using the CU?Speed is a function of distance and time; both are dimensions that are created by the Pulsoid (www.CQthus.com/PT/P) that is a direct consequence of the Conceptual Unit (www.CQthus.com/PT/CU) (CU).
Your question indicates that you do not understand the Elliptical Constant. Can you explain the EC in a sentence or two so that I can get a handle on what you do understand about the EC?
Summarized, I would say:
The elliptical constant is how nature defines "One", and as a result, all Natural Integers (since they are all multiples of One). It is defined using basic geometry.
That is what I do understand. However; I'm having trouble connecting this geometry to Reality; I can construct a gemetric shape with a pencil and a protractor. I can determine the charactaristics of these geometric shapes and understand the system I've built in an intiutive manner. However, what is to say that any of the shapes I've constructed represent "anything" at all? Especially when that "something" is supposedly going faster than the speed of light.
I may find a new line segment that has a natural integer length on an ellipse. How does one know that its value has any significance in Reality? And out of curiosity, what lead you to believe that the lengths salient lines of an ellipse represented what you claim they do (vector, amplitude, etc)?
Here's a question regarding the logic of the EC. What is the primordial definition of Epsilon, the EC? If one were to manipulte v = εP˛ to isolate ε, you would have ε = v/P˛. However, if both v and P˛ are natural integers than they rely on "One", which is ε. Therefore, it seems the definition of ε is circular.
Also, how else can one construct an ellipse, than by using a mathematical definition, which, as we said before, is subject to Godel's Incompleteness Theorem? Not to mention, that the formula defining an ellipse requires numbers, which are defined by the said EC, or epsilon, which is defined by the ellipse we are trying to create?
Epsilon=One
03-23-2007, 09:28 PM
Summarized, I would say:
The elliptical constant is how nature defines "One", and as a result, all Natural Integers (since they are all multiples of One). It is defined using basic geometry.I'm out the door in a minute; so, I'll be short now, to give you something to think about; and, answer in more detail later.
The reply is correct; however, it does appear that you do not understand the geometry/Unimetry (www.CQthus.com/PT/Unimetry) of the EC.
The most salient feature of the EC is that it is the only constant in Nature.
The moment there is seminal motion (www.CQthus.com/PT/SM) the radius of Infinity (www.CQthus.com/PT/ROI) (ROI) is defined as the Conceptual Unit (CU) (heuristically the EC) without contrived labels such as inches, meters, seconds, etc.As a constant: the EC remains unchanged regardless of the size/speed of the ellipsoidal Pulsoid (www.CQthus.com/PT/P). This concept of a constant is found nowhere else in Nature. The EC is constant for every Conceptual Ellipse (www.CQthus.com/PT/CE) (CE), which can be any ellipse.The EC is quintessential beauty, elegance, ubiquity, and . . . counterintuitive to most all logic.
...I'm having trouble connecting this geometry to RealityThe geometry and the EC are symbolism; the Conceptual Unit is Reality (www,CQthus.com/PT/R).
The connection to Reality is that the CU is derived fron elliptical geometry; and, there is nothing in Reality that is not derived, or defined, from ellipsoidal motion/geometry.
Correct me if I'm wrong; If all structural parts must be natural integers for an ellipse to be pulsoidal, the correct key is generated by the value for wave, w, of a conceptual ellipse (4, 12, 24, 40). Each one of these occurrences is considered a "tick" in Fundamental Intrinsic Time.
The CU measures the time of seminal motion's pulse and subsequent Pulsoidal pulses; thus establishing the radius of the smallest quantity of three dimensional space, which is the simplest resonance phenomenon; while also controlling the direction and “flow” of time for the fundamental frequencies of the Cosmos.
This is the rub: I do not understand how/why v = εP˛ establishes orthogonality. Or, how the relationship between the time of seminal motion's pulse and the time of pulsoidal pulses have any connection to a clear definition of "three dimensional space".
Epsilon=One
04-09-2007, 06:59 AM
You are beginning to understand. I am not always as clear as I should be as to what is heuristic and what is natural.
Correct me if I'm wrong; If all structural parts must be natural integers for an ellipse to be pulsoidal, the correct key is generated by the value for wave, w, of a conceptual ellipse (4, 12, 24, 40). Each one of these occurrences is considered a "tick" in Fundamental Intrinsic Time.Yes, in a sense. 4, 12, 24, and 40 Conceptual Units (www.CQthus.com/PT/CU) (CU) are the value of the wave, "w," for the first “tick” of an equalateral Brunardot Ellipse (www.CQthus.com/PT/BE) (BE) and the first 3 ticks of an obtuse BE. The wave for the first 3 simultaneous acute BE “ticks” would be 6, 8, and 10. (The BE heuristically describes an ellipsoidal quantum.)
In all cases the first 4 Keys would be: 1, 2, 3, and 4.
The “tick” (Conceptual Unit CU) is constant at all times: CU = Pulse, “P,” minus Key, “K,” equals One. (The Key is the radius of the Resoloid (www.Resoloid.com) which is the radius of either hypotenuse circle, “Hr.”)
…I do not understand how/why v = εP˛ establishes orthogonality.The quaquaversal seminal motion (www.CQthus.com/PT/SM) is all probabilities in the manner of Feynman diagrams; when the motion is such that v = εP˛, the Pulsoid Theorem (www.CQthus.com/PT/eP2), then there is harmonic Triquametric motion (www.CQthus.com/PT/TM) (TM) that creates a resonance (imagine the jets of a circular Jacuzzi meeting in the middle that form a turbulence) that momentarily acquires a transfer of energy that causes an interruption/pulse.
Or, how the relationship between the time of seminal motion's pulse and the time of pulsoidal pulses have any connection to a clear definition of "three dimensional space".Because of the separation dynamics of quaquaversal seminal motion (www.CQthus.com/PT/SM) becoming TM, the energy/motion is in the form of an ellipsoid defined by an ellipse
(c˛ = 2v˛ – s˛, the Brunardot Theorem (www.CQthus.com/PT/BT)). The amplitude, “a,” and radius, “r,” are perpendicular to the major diameter, “M,” (two opposing vectors, “v”); thus, orthogonality.
Also, the Inverse Square Law (www.CQthus.com/PT/ISL) (ISL) evolves because of the relationship, at all times, of the Pulse, “P,” to the vectors, “v.”
The amplitude, “a,” and radius, “r,” are perpendicular to the major diameter, “M,” (two opposing vectors, “v”); thus, orthogonality.
The two opposing vectors are on the same plane. How can they describe different dimensions?
If these two-dimensional ellipses are heuristic, how can one ascertain that the orthogonal dimensions (what we perceive) are defined by the structural parts of these ellipses?
Epsilon=One
04-09-2007, 08:08 PM
The two opposing vectors are on the same plane. How can they describe different dimensions?The two dimensional ellipse heuristically describes a three dimensional Pulsoid (www.CQthus.com/PT/P)/quantum.
If these two-dimensional ellipses are heuristic, how can one ascertain that the orthogonal dimensions (what we perceive) are defined by the structural parts of these ellipses?The orthogonal dimensions are decribed by the three dimensional Pulsoid (www.CQthus.com/PT/P) that is the only possible (Feynman diagram probability) geometric configuration that is possible because of the vector arrangement at emergence/separation that results in the ellipsoidal manifestation that defines the Elliptical Constant (www.CQthus.com/PT/EC) (EC) that decribes the Conceptual Unit (CU) that creates the resonance pulse.
Thus, it can be said that the EC is the most important discovery in the history of mathematics.
I'm trying to determine the CU to the anthropoidal perception of time. I am aware that seconds are contrivances, but is it possible to convert seconds to CU? If so, how?
Epsilon=One
04-27-2007, 03:32 PM
I'm trying to determine the CU to the anthropoidal perception of time. I am aware that seconds are contrivances, but is it possible to convert seconds to CU? If so, how?Pick the definition of "seconds" that you prefer; then, work backwards to atomic oscillations until you reach the Planck unit.
vBulletin® v3.6.8, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.