Fractal Universe Theory

[AlexBeck7]

The following web page describes how a fractal of universes is sustained by going through big bang - big wormhole cycles where the fundamental particle is a universe of its own.

freeworldalliance.biz/GrandUnifiedTheory.html

Please tell me where I should publish this theory or send it.

[Identity]

The following web page describes how a fractal of universes is sustained by going through big bang - big wormhole cycles where the fundamental particle is a universe of its own.

freeworldalliance.biz/GrandUnifiedTheory.html


On what do you base your assertions? I see no basis for it in the reality which I observe.
"(Infinity + 1)...(Infinity + 2).."? What's that all about? (Among other things).

[Epsilon=One]

The following web page describes how a fractal of universes is sustained by going through big bang - big wormhole cycles where the fundamental particle is a universe of its own.How does this theory fare when you consider that there never was a Big Bang, wormholes don't exist, and the Universe is as defined . . . a singularity?

[AlexBeck7]

On what do you base your assertions? I see no basis for it in the reality which I observe.
"(Infinity + 1)...(Infinity + 2).."? What's that all about? (Among other things).

I base my assertions on the fact that because of the influx of gravons the number of universes that exist in this system dwarfs the amount of every other type of universe because there are so many universes in this fractal system. The infinity + 1 is just describing an unreal number system using real numbers. It doesn't really work but it can help you visualize the full irrationalness of unreal numbers.

[AlexBeck7]

How does this theory fare when you consider that there never was a Big Bang, wormholes don't exist, and the Universe is as defined . . . a singularity?

The big bang is all around us we knew that ever since we discovered everything flying away from us. Wormholes are mearly a photon that is so energetic it forms a black hole which will carry whatever phon passes through it until it leaves another singular photon black hole.

[Epsilon=One]

The big bang is all around us we knew that ever since we discovered everything flying away from us.The fact that Hubble Space Telescope (HST) observations indicate galactic recession is precisely the evidence that the Big Bang is a mythical hoax that I have no doubt has well been understood as a hoax by most world-class theoretical physicists for more than ten years.

HST observed accelerating, galactic recession, which would be impossible considering that the Big Bang only banged once.

And, after the Big Bang "banged" exactly where did the opposing force come from that created mass from Light/energy? Actually, as PT rationalizes, Light (bosons) traumatically evolves from mass (fermions).

Pulsoid Theory's (www.CQthus.com/PT/PTis) (PT) concept of evolution is the only theory that I know of that rationally explains such accelerating, galactic recession. PT predicted and was based upon such acceleration from its earliest development in the mid '50s.

Wormholes are mearly a photon that is so energetic it forms a black hole which will carry whatever phon passes through it until it leaves another singular photon black hole.Wormholes have never been observed. They are metaphysical until there is better evidence than the fantasies of theoretical physicists.

You speak of a photon; how do you define a photon? Physically, precisely, what is a photon?

[Identity]

I base my assertions on the fact that because of the influx of gravons the number of universes that exist in this system dwarfs the amount of every other type of universe because there are so many universes in this fractal system. The infinity + 1 is just describing an unreal number system using real numbers. It doesn't really work but it can help you visualize the full irrationalness of unreal numbers.

What is the source of this influx of gravons?
You say the number of universes that exist in the system dwarfs the amount of "every other type of universe"; but the "infinite layers of universes" which you describe would regulate that those "other types of universe" would indeed exist within your system.
What is "fact" about your statement that the influx of gravons determines the number of universes which exist?
To me "infinity + 1" and "infinity + 2" is just 1 and 2. Just with an arbitrary and meaningless 'value' in front. The meaning of inifinity is lost when you add anything to it.
For unreal numbers, see Don Bradmans batting average. Unreal! :)

[Epsilon=One]

What is "fact" about your statement that the influx of gravons determines the number of universes which exist?
To me "infinity + 1" and "infinity + 2" is just 1 and 2. Just with an arbitrary and meaningless 'value' in front. The meaning of inifinity is lost when you add anything to it.
For unreal numbers, see Don Bradmans batting average.Infinity (www.CQthus.com/PT/I) can be neither added to nor subtracted from.

Infinity (www.CQthus.com/PT/I) is a singularity that has nothing to do with size.

Most likely you are confusing the concept of a singularity with the infinite and/or the infinitesimal.

[AlexBeck7]

Wormholes have never been observed. They are metaphysical until there is better evidence than the fantasies of theoretical physicists.

You speak of a photon; how do you define a photon? Physically, precisely, what is a photon?

Just because wormholes haven't been observed does not mean they are a foundational element of the universe.

A photon is a byproduct of special relativity applied to electronic attraction and repulsion. See wikipedia for more information on what a photon is.

[Epsilon=One]

Just because wormholes haven't been observed does not mean they are a foundational element of the universe.You seem to be making my argument. Nothing can be a "foundational element of the universe" unless it is observed or rationalized beyond the contrived symbolization of current mathematics.

A photon is a byproduct of special relativity applied to electronic attraction and repulsion.A "byproduct" of a mathematical concept cannot be a physical reality. Especially, a flawed concept . . . as Einstein well understood.

Your definition is now more confusing. What exactly is "electronic attraction and repulsion" beyond a metaphysical concept of theoretical physicists?

See wikipedia for more information on what a photon is.There is nothing in Wikipedia that would lead me to believe in a concept of what the physical photon exactly is.

Except for Pulsoid Theory (PT) (www.CQthus.com/PT/PTis), I know of no logical, rationalization that defines what is usually, physically intended by the term "photon."

[AlexBeck7]

What is the source of this influx of gravons?
You say the number of universes that exist in the system dwarfs the amount of "every other type of universe"; but the "infinite layers of universes" which you describe would regulate that those "other types of universe" would indeed exist within your system.
What is "fact" about your statement that the influx of gravons determines the number of universes which exist?
To me "infinity + 1" and "infinity + 2" is just 1 and 2. Just with an arbitrary and meaningless 'value' in front. The meaning of inifinity is lost when you add anything to it.
For unreal numbers, see Don Bradmans batting average. Unreal! :)

Gravons come from smaller universes within the Hive that certain number of levels deep.

Other universes cannot exist outside this system because there is nothing other than Hives to construct the universe with. These other universes can however be emulated within our own in finite volume universe generators.

There is a difference in the quantity of particles in a infinite particle density finite volume and an infinite volume. There are infinite quantities to assign to unreal numbers there is just no correspondence in the real number system.

[Identity]

.
Other universes cannot exist outside this system because there is nothing other than Hives to construct the universe with. These other universes can however be emulated within our own in finite volume universe generators.


If you have a system of infinite universes how is it that there are universes that don't exist within that system?
If you have a system of universes where "other universes cannot exist" why can those universes be emulated? How would the system know to emulate universes which don't exist?

[Epsilon=One]

If you have a system of infinite universes how is it that there are universes that don't exist within that system?
If you have a system of universes where "other universes cannot exist" why can those universes be emulated? How would the system know to emulate universes which don't exist?There cannot be multiple Universes/Reality. (www.101123.com/R) The Universe is perpetual/steady-state. As such it must have a locus that is congruent with UnReality/Infinity. (www.101123.com/I)

Infinity is a singularity; thus . . . One Universe. Anything else is nonsense.

How else can you explain the "container" that holds the Universe? This is the paradox that ridicules the Big Bang for what it is: a god-type myth.

[Identity]

The Universe is perpetual/steady-state. As such it must have a locus that is congruent with UnReality/Infinity. (www.101123.com/I)


How does the universe being perpetual/steady state imply that it has a locus that is congruent with unreality/infinity?

[Epsilon=One]

How does the universe being perpetual/steady state imply that it has a locus that is congruent with unreality/infinity?Perpetual/steady state implies "something" without time, which must be a singularity. Infinity (101123.com/I) is a singularity. There can be only one singularity, by definition; as, a singularity can be neither added to nor subtracted from.

The Universe exists. By definition, the Universe encompasses "all that there is"; therefore, it must encompass it's container . . . a paradox that can only be resolved by the concept of a singularity.

Since there can only be one singularity, and the Universe exists; and, by definition, Infinity (101123.com/I) does not, the congruency must be at their locii.

You might say that existence is the "flip-side" of total entropy.

[AlexBeck7]

If you have a system of infinite universes how is it that there are universes that don't exist within that system?
If you have a system of universes where "other universes cannot exist" why can those universes be emulated? How would the system know to emulate universes which don't exist?

Other universes don't exist in the system because they are not as cool. But they can be emulated just as video games now can be emulated without having a universe to reference. They will be custom made by humans who decide what will happen in those universes if we don't just turn them on and set them on their way.

[Identity]

Other universes don't exist in the system because they are not as cool. But they can be emulated just as video games now can be emulated without having a universe to reference. They will be custom made by humans who decide what will happen in those universes if we don't just turn them on and set them on their way.

It's funny that you should refer to universes which don't exist as being "not as cool", since most things (correction: all things) which don't exist are neither hotter nor colder than any other thing which does not exist, or for that matter anything which does exist.
And if you think that video games are "emulated" without having a universe to reference then I must ask, where exactly are you from? for it is obviously not this universe, nor any other which is hotter, colder, or one which can be referenced.
You imply that these universes will be custom made by humans, but to my knowlege fractal geometry, although 'discovered' by humans was not invented by humans and is in fact a part of our universe and which describes itself to us and which cannot be "emulated" by us to create a universe. I think you are speaking absolute gibberish!
(Pardon my exclamation mark).

[Epsilon=One]

Other universes don't exist in the system because they are not as cool. But they can be emulated just as video games now can be emulated without having a universe to reference. They will be custom made by humans who decide what will happen in those universes if we don't just turn them on and set them on their way.It is beyond belief that anyone can believe that "...humans (can) decide what will happen in (other) universes..." Or, that said other universes "will be custom made by humans..."; I consider a fool anyone that believes an anthopoidal god can make a Universe; not to mention a mere anthropoid.

[Epsilon=One]

It's funny that you should refer to universes which don't exist as being "not as cool", since most things (correction: all things) which don't exist are neither hotter nor colder than any other thing which does not exist, or for that matter anything which does exist.It's nice to see there is some logic on this thread.

You imply that these universes will be custom made by humans, but to my knowlege fractal geometry, although 'discovered' by humans was not invented by humans and is in fact a part of our universe and which describes itself to us and which cannot be "emulated" by us to create a universe. I think you are speaking absolute gibberish!
(Pardon my exclamation mark).You're pardoned; I would have used 3 or 4!!!!

All mathematics is a part of Nature. I enjoy your insight.

[AlexBeck7]

It's funny that you should refer to universes which don't exist as being "not as cool", since most things (correction: all things) which don't exist are neither hotter nor colder than any other thing which does not exist, or for that matter anything which does exist.
And if you think that video games are "emulated" without having a universe to reference then I must ask, where exactly are you from? for it is obviously not this universe, nor any other which is hotter, colder, or one which can be referenced.
You imply that these universes will be custom made by humans, but to my knowlege fractal geometry, although 'discovered' by humans was not invented by humans and is in fact a part of our universe and which describes itself to us and which cannot be "emulated" by us to create a universe. I think you are speaking absolute gibberish!
(Pardon my exclamation mark).


Coolness is in reference to how desirable a universe is to live in and has nothing to do with temperature. I am obviously from this universe by the definition of what here is. I am here regardedless of whether or not here is an emulated or the natural universe. Please explain the last paragraph it is absolute gibberish! (don't pardon the exclamation point)

[AlexBeck7]

It is beyond belief that anyone can believe that "...humans (can) decide what will happen in (other) universes..." Or, that said other universes "will be custom made by humans..."; I consider a fool anyone that believes an anthopoidal god can make a Universe; not to mention a mere anthropoid.

Why don't you actually give a reason why not. My supporting statement is not needed because humans have unlimited capability to innovate that will not be over until we have our universe generators.

[Epsilon=One]

Why don't you actually give a reason why not. My supporting statement is not needed because humans have unlimited capability to innovate that will not be over until we have our universe generators.I repeat: "It is beyond belief . . ."

I would have thought observation and logic were obvious as to my argument.

Look about at the frailty of the existence of anything that is living, especially humans. Considering such frailty, "it is beyond belief" to state that human capability is "unlimited" as to innovation or anything else. It could well be argued that humans, like so many other life forms, have already sealed their fate. If so, this is particularly irksome, as humans have the most powerful ability to make conscious decisions.

However, regardless of the fate of humans, humans exist within a Universe that has limits which humans, or anything eles, can not exceed because of fundamental laws that said Universe has evolved from.

[AlexBeck7]

I repeat: "It is beyond belief . . ."

I would have thought observation and logic were obvious as to my argument.

Look about at the frailty of the existence of anything that is living, especially humans. Considering such frailty, "it is beyond belief" to state that human capability is "unlimited" as to innovation or anything else. It could well be argued that humans, like so many other life forms, have already sealed their fate. If so, this is particularly irksome, as humans have the most powerful ability to make conscious decisions.

However, regardless of the fate of humans, humans exist within a Universe that has limits which humans, or anything eles, can not exceed because of fundamental laws that said Universe has evolved from.


Where is the boundary on our potential to create things if the fundamental particles of the universe have a 0 size. If it is impossible to create these universe generators with the tools we will have in the future then maybe we will be able to construct them with technology that we may acquire from progenitor aliens who happened to exist ever since the universe began.

[Identity]

Where is the boundary on our potential to create things if the fundamental particles of the universe have a 0 size. If it is impossible to create these universe generators with the tools we will have in the future then maybe we will be able to construct them with technology that we may acquire from progenitor aliens who happened to exist ever since the universe began.

You can't base a theory on speculation and unfounded assumptions. But that's not to say your idea is completely without merit. Perhaps science fiction is more your forte.

[Epsilon=One]

Where is the boundary on our potential to create things if the fundamental particles of the universe have a 0 size."The fundamental particles of the universe" do not "have a 0 size"; the minimum quantum that can exist must have a vector, "v," (Pulsoid Theory (www.101123.com/PTis)) of at least four Conceptual Units (www.101123.com/CU) (CU), which are somewhat analogous to the Planck constant. Without such a vector size there is no fundamental, intrinsic time (www.101123.com/FIT) (FIT); thus, no quanta.

If it is impossible to create these universe generators with the tools we will have in the future then maybe we will be able to construct them with technology that we may acquire from progenitor aliens who happened to exist ever since the universe began.The Universe has no beginning nor ending. To think otherwise is to think without logic . . . or an understanding of the definition of "Universe."

[AlexBeck7]

You can't base a theory on speculation and unfounded assumptions. But that's not to say your idea is completely without merit. Perhaps science fiction is more your forte.

Einstein speculated General Relativity. The foundation is clear when you consider how many universes are in this system and compare that to virtual any other viable system. The gravons will be so many it is not even funny. If this system existed then consider the probability that we are not part of it.

I am a screenplay writer in nanotech war. My trilogy is complete and I am now editing them.

[Epsilon=One]

The foundation is clear when you consider how many universes are in this system and compare that to virtual any other viable system.The foundation is not clear.

Your key words are: "(sic.) virtual(ly)" and "viable."

I am a screenplay writer in nanotech war. My trilogy is complete and I am now editing them.Science fiction writing is where your expertise lies; certainly, as currently expressed, not in the real world of science.