The crux of the matter . . .

[Epsilon=One]

........The crux of the matter . . .
..............or, what Pulsoid Theory is really about.

The Problem
An understanding of Reality is stymied by the unquestioned acceptance of the Big Bang theory.

Salient, succinct issues that the Big Bang theory does not adequately explain are:
1.) Where did the Big Bang “bang” from; or, Where is the source of power located that energizes all the motion within Reality?;

2.) What occurred the first moments after the Big Bang “banged”?;

3.) How does a structural force that is opposed to the Big Bang, such as gravity, occur from the force of the Big Bang?;

4.) how could a single “bang” impart the observed, accelerating galactic recession?;

5.) How?; or, Does the Big Bang cycle?; That is, Is the Big Bang a singular event; or, is its energy conserved?
And, of course, when closely examined, the Big Bang theory, also, raises many, other more subtle paradoxes.

Primarily, current, post-modern, theoretical physics depends heavily upon the Big Bang theory for its foundation because there is no viable, alternative theory for another structural force that is opposite to the illusion of gravity’s attractiveness . . . “at-a-distance.”

These two metaphysical forces: the Big Bang and gravity, with several other contrived forces and the ill-defined force of light, together with fundamental mathematics that is equally as unprovable, as alleged by Kurt Gödel’s (http://www.usna.edu/Users/math/meh/godel.html) Incompleteness Theorem (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/GoedelsIncompletenessTheorem.html), round out the fundamental concepts that all standard models of theoretical physics are derived from.

Even theoretical physics’ definition of force is highly speculative with several incompatible defining equations; the commonest of which is: Force equals mass times acceleration. F = ma is of particular interest in the case of radiant energy, which is considered one of the most important fundamental forces. Radiant energy, Light, is considered to have neither mass nor acceleration!!! And, not too surprisingly, all the other fundamental forces of post-modern theoretical physics are just as ludicrous . . . little more than academic gods.

Without the theoretical Big Bang, there would be no rationale for the creation of structures, as all matter would collapse upon itself. Structure requires opposing theoretical forces such as the Big Bang and gravity.

Gravity is theoretical because there is no mechanism that has ever been explained for gravity’s universal attraction-at-a-distance (http://www.physicsmathforums.com/showthread.php?t=127); nor, is there consensus as to the speed of gravity.

The Criteria
Reality must be rationalized such that it can be understandable by the layman.

Currently, there is little alternative theory among the academic elite as to the fundamental forces, and a cyclic etiology of these forces, that is reconcilable with observation and philosophical logic.

Fundamental issues, such as the following, must be explained in the vernacular of reasonable persons if sentient beings are expected to wisely, and with maximal happiness, survive their hostile environment:
1.) The fine-tuned, entangled harmony of the Cosmos and subatomic phenomena must have a universal timing mechanism (http://www.physicsmathforums.com/showthread.php?t=274) somewhat analogous to a clock’s escapement (http://mvheadrick.free.fr/escapement.html) with a constant that is established within any closed system;

2.) There must be a geometric description for the mechanism of seminal motion that reconciles with “dark” energy and the structure of subsequent dimensions; such that, said motion manifests as radiant energy and “dark” matter;
`
3.) The etiology of radiant energy morphing to mass must be explainable such that universal entanglement and gravitational effects are not inexplicable;

4.) The duality of Light, as either a particle or a wave, must be explained as other than a metaphysical phenomenon;

5.) The etiology of all the processes of Reality must be explained in a manner such that said processes cycle through a single entity that is referred to as the Universe.
The Solution
Reality is motion. The geometry of Seminal motion (http://www.physicsmathforums.com/showthread.php?t=110) must be described in a manner that is reducible to “that which is simplest”; such that, the simplicity contains all the fundamental complexity of “that which has evolved.”

Basically, the geometry of the simplest radiant energy must pulse sinusoidally as it begins to exist from a locus that is beyond the Universe and that is congruent with the locus of Reality; such that, all energy is conserved:
1.) The universal Elliptical Constant (http://www.physicsmathforums.com/showthread.php?t=107) sets the rhythmic pace of all fundamental motion such that the order of the Universe is constant; that is: there is one fundamental set of laws that consistently governs all phenomena;

2.) The internal geometry of radiant energy is the ellipsoid; wherein energy appears to be “dark” because it is reflected by a locus of energy that directs the pulses from each originating focus such that it is conserved and does not escape said locus while coalescing to the phenomenon of “dark” matter (http://www.physicsmathforums.com/showthread.php?t=155) that occurs as coalescence morphs said expanding, ellipsoidal locus to that of a sphere, that is referred to as a Pulsoid (http://www.physicsmathforums.com/showthread.php?t=98), that reaches a point of Critical Coalescence (http://www.physicsmathforums.com/showthread.php?t=204) from which accelerating compression begins its inevitable evolution to Critical Compression (http://www.physicsmathforums.com/showthread.php?t=205) within quasars and gamma-ray bursts;

3.) The continuous compression of infinitely large, continuously created “dark” matter (http://www.physicsmathforums.com/showthread.php?t=155) fuels the unending compressive forces that result in the illusion of gravitational attraction and the subsequent resultant force that is observed as accelerating galactic recession, which creates the observed illusion of an expanding Universe that is otherwise inexplicable with philosophic logic;

4.) The duality of Light is a phenomenon of hyper-relativistic, simultaneous oscillations of slide, swing, and vibration that pulses in a manner referred to as Triquametric motion (http://www.physicsmathforums.com/showthread.php?t=101);

5.) The Equlibrium Theory of Reality (http://physicsmathforums.com/showthread.php?t=131) consists of four congeneric realms of coalescence, propagation, compression, and dispersion (http://www.physicsmathforums.com/showthread.php?t=130) which cycle endlessly.
Summary
It is important to understand: Why an ellipsoid is the most fundamental geometric form?; and, Why the ellipsoid has two equal foci?

In any planetary system if a sun is located at the focus of said system, which must be elliptical, What is located at the other focus?; and, Why? These questions, and their answers, go to the crux of the fumdamental concepts of Cosmogony.

Please ask questions. :)

With questions it’s possible to know if
comments are logical and convincing;
or whether clarification is required.

......http://www.g2d.us/ws.gifhttp://www.g2d.us/s.gifhttp://www.g2d.us/t.gifhttp://www.g2d.us/m.jpg

[ste]

F = ma is of particular interest in the case of radiant energy, which is considered one of the most important fundamental forces. Radiant energy, Light, is considered to have neither ma ss nor acceleration!
I am unfamiliar with light being defined as a fundamental force. As far as I understand, it is a self-propagating wave which also exhibits properties of particles. How could light possibly be explained as a force? What is it acting upon ("pushing")? What is the equal and opposite reaction?

Why is an ellipsoid the most fundamental geometric form? Why does the ellipsoid have two equal foci?

[Epsilon=One]

I am unfamiliar with light being defined as a fundamental force.The fundamental forces that all physics is based upon are most often considered as: gravity, light (referred to as the electromagnetic force), the strong interaction, and the weak interaction. Some consider the weak interaction and light to be unified as a single force; others are increasingly considering the force that causes galactic recession as a force.

Thus, there are three to five Standard Model forces depending upon who in academia is listing them. All these forces are metaphysical as they are defined by the Standard Models.

As far as I understand, it is a self-propagating wave which also exhibits properties of particles. How could light possibly be explained as a force? What is it acting upon ("pushing")? What is the equal and opposite reaction?Force is, conventionally, most often defined (but not always) as: force equals ma ss times acceleration. Light has no ma ss (fermions) and the Standard Models define Light without acceleration; thus, you have a good question.

I contend that Light has acceleration (actually the Light that we are commonly aware of has decelleration); you'll have to ask the theoretical physicists as to why they define light as they do, while also considering it as a force.

I, also, have never understood the basis of academic physics. Except maybe as voodoo to enhance the image of its practitioners.

Why is an ellipsoid the most fundamental geometric form?Because it is the first orthogonal form that evolves.

Why does the ellipsoid have two equal foci?Actually, it has three points of emergence, along a line, for each pulse. As the ellipse emerges it expands from these three points, triquametrically; and the line also expands. The forces of expansion meet and the vectors of this reaction react in a manner such as they form an ellipsoidal locus. The points where the three fundamental forces of expansion meet are referred to as the ellipsoidal foci. Said foci have many interesting geometrical properties.