The Physics is first of all Vacuum .

[socratus]

Two sights of the Vacuum.
In a modern science there are two mutually exclusive points of view on behaviour of particles in Vacuum.
One point of view is a position of classical physics which approves, that
In Vacuum at T=0K any movement of particles stops.
And if in the Empire of a cold there is no movement is a dead empire.

But other point of view completely rejects this formulation.
This point of view is expressed with the quantum theory.
In 1911 of M. Planck has offered, that energy does not address in zero at aspiration to T=0K.
He has declared this on 1-st Solvay congress.

« Energy at T=0K » became the main problem in the physics,
because, « the Physics is first of all Vacuum ».
Gradually began to approve, that Vacuum T=0K is not empty dead space,
there lives the "virtual" particles.
These particles originally have negative and imaginary mass, and then make « virtual transition » and get positive mass, become real particles.
But as thus look mystical « virtual particles » as they make « virtual transitions »
anybody particularly does not explain.
Let's think over these "virtual" particles.
Let's ask a question: What geometrical form of "virtual" particles
In Vacuum T=0K?
The answer:
According to the laws of physics (J. Charles, Gay-Lussac, V. Nernst, A. Einstein )
that particles in Vacuum cannot have volume and consequently should
to be flat figures. Means, particles have the geometrical form - a circle,
as from all flat figures the circle has the most optimum form: С/D=p.
What do these "virtual" circles in Vacuum?
The answer is given with the theory of radiation of absolutely black body.
The theory considers area of the space which are being absolute thermal balance.
It is possible only at Т=0К. But it is known, that such condition
is a « thermal death ». And in the nature it is not observed.
Therefore Planck, studying this area, has come to conclusion:
that condition Т=0К has changed, in this space there should be a radiation of quantum of light,
possessing an internal impulse h=Et=1.
So, « the virtual circle » is transformed to quantum of light.
This quantum of light has an impulse h=Et=1 and flies with constant speed с=1.
From this assumption the Quantum theory was born.
Therefore the Quantum theory is a theory only about Quantum of light and him
various transformations.
And the Classical theory considers all other particles.
These particles have mass much greater than quantum of light and
move with speeds much smaller than quantum of light.
If we shall understand a difference between quantum of light and all other particles,
that all contradictions in the physics disappear, and all physics becomes
harmoniously integral science.
* * *
If you have time and desire, I ask you to visit my site:
http://www.socratus.com
Thanks.
Good wishes.
Israel Sadovnik .

[socratus]

The Vacuum and the Electron
All know, that an electron is not a firm sphere. All know, that its form can be changed.
But nobody understands the borders of the change of the geometrical form of the electron.
So, what are the borders of this change? Quantum theory gives an answer to this question.
It says that at the interaction of the electron with the vacuum, the energy and mass of the
electron become infinite. Physics does not understand what to do with infinite sizes
and therefore have thought up "a method of renormalization", a method
"to sweep the dust under the carpet" / Feynman./
But the situation can be understood another way. Electrons, having the geometrical form
of a sphere, lose their volume and turn into an indefinitely flat circle. In this is the reason
for the occurrence of infinite sizes for the electron. But in physics we know
only one particle which has the form of a flat circle. It is a quantum of light
which flies rectilinearly with speed c= 1.
Hence, the electron turns into a quantum of light. Hence, the electron and a quantum of light
is the same particle in different states.
In the books it is written, that electrons interact among themselves with the help of
a quantum of light. In the books it is written that an electron in an atom passing from
one orbit to another radiates a quantum of light. It should be understood as follows.
The electron has a quantum of light in a pocket or under a "shirt" which from time to time
is freed. Interesting. But why is it necessary for it to hide?

[socratus]

The Vacuum and Special Relativity Theory.
Special Relativity Theory examines the behaviour of a quantum of light in the vacuum.
1) The First law of SRT - the speed of a quantum of light in vacuum has
a maximal magnitude (constant, absolute) of c=1.
2) SRT is not considered a gravitational field.
For this reason, Einstein created General Relativity Theory in 1915.
The field in which there is no gravitation is a vacuum.
3) This asserts that action in SRT occurs with particles in
negative four-dimensional (Minkowski) space. This space is absolute.
Mathematicians have constructed its model and speak
of this negative space as completely abstract.
Nobody sees that it has no connection to real existence.
This is similar to a sad joke.
For 100 years everyone has admired SRT.
Millions of articles, reviews and books have been written
and the United Nations has decided to establish 2005 as the centennial year of SRT.
Consider that all that is clear in this theory
is that negative four-dimensional space is abstract and has no real existence.
My God! There does not appear to be anyone to laugh at this joke!
Everyone searches for complex models of four-dimensional space, but truth lies in simplicity. All is very simple.
We meet the negative characteristic of space only in the vacuum, and in the vacuum,
space is merged with time (negative four-dimensional space).
According to the first law, the speed of light is absolute and movement occurs
in the absolute vacuum. So why does everyone speak and write that there is no
absolute movement; that only relative movement v =s/t is real?
Why does everyone say that there is no absolute reference system,
if the absolute speed can be only in absolute space?
Here we have one of the paradoxes in human intelligence.

[Epsilon=One]

…the behaviour of a quantum of light in the vacuum.In Reality there exists no “quantum” of light; nor, is there a perfect vacuum.

Nobody sees that it has no connection to real existence. This is similar to a sad joke.
For 100 years everyone has admired SRT.
Millions of articles, reviews and books have been written
and the United Nations has decided to establish 2005 as the centennial year of SRT.
Consider that all that is clear in this theory
is that negative four-dimensional space is abstract and has no real existence.
My God! There does not appear to be anyone to laugh at this joke!I laugh with you. SRT certainly has its limitations . . . as Einstein well understood.

Everyone searches for complex models of four-dimensional space, but truth lies in simplicity. All is very simple.Fundamental “truth” must lie in simplicity; and, all that is fundamental must be simple . . . and yet, that simplicity muct contain the qualities of all complexity . . . such is seminal motion (http://www.physicsmathforums.com/showthread.php?t=179).

We meet the negative characteristic of space only in the vacuum, and in the vacuum,
space is merged with time (negative four-dimensional space).
According to the first law, the speed of light is absolute and movement occurs
in the absolute vacuum. So why does everyone speak and write that there is no
absolute movement; that only relative movement v =s/t is real?
Why does everyone say that there is no absolute reference system,
if the absolute speed can be only in absolute space?
Here we have one of the paradoxes in human intelligence.Human intelligence is still struggling with the abstract. Fundamental concepts, though simple, are generally counter-intuitive.

There not only is absolute movement; but, this movement can be said to be regulated by the same constant. Actually, all movement so derived and so regulated.

This constant is referred to as the Elliptical Constant (http://www.physicsmathforums.com/showthread.php?t=107).