Science & Philosophy. Religion & Physics. XXIc.

[socratus]

Science & Philosophy. Religion & Physics. XXIc.
Can the Laws of Physics be Unified?.!
* * *
It can, not be that the Nature was arranged so strange,
as the physics think of her. Their thinking is so strange,
that they offer paradoxical ideas.
* * *
Many of physics consider, that: " the Physics is first of all Vacuum. "
P. Dirac wrote:
" Тhe problem of the exact description of vacuum, in my opinion,
is the basic problem worth now before physics.
Really, if you can’t correctly describe vacuum,
how it is possible expect for the correct description something more complex? ".
It is completely correct.
Physics in Vacuum have groped true and condition
of infinite / eternal Vacuum characterized
with one simple physical parameter T=0K.
The philosophy of science begins from T=0K .
The physics begins from T=0K.
The religion begins from T=0K .
The origin of Existence begins from T=0K .
* * *
If you have time and desire, I ask you to visit my site:
http://www.socratus.com
Thanks.
Israel Sadovnik .
Socratus.

[socratus]

The Old Philosophical Problem.

The dispute on the divisibility of a particle has been conducted from ancient times.
There were two opposing views:
1) a particle can be divided infinitely,
2) the division of a particle comes to an end when it reaches the ultimate particle
They began by splitting a body into finer and finer parts: to molecules,
molecule to atoms, atoms to electrons, protons and neutrons.
Then they constructed accelerators. They began see if protons and neutrons
could be divided into other elementary particles and in the process,
creating so many particles that it is even difficult to list them.
But physicists do not believe that there is a true initial particle.
In listening to their explanation of the situation in the microcosm, one is reminded of a madhouse. Only there is it possible to learn that the part is more than whole.
When physicists began to study the macrocosm, they were sure that
in using the formulas, equations and laws they relieved the
consciousness of man from prejudice. Therefore the physics was considered
an ally of common sense. But when they began to study the microcosm,
they began to complain of paradoxical devices. Then physics became an enemy
of common sense.
Can physics be paradoxical? Can nature be paradoxical? Is it the
laws of nature or the thinking of the physicist?
A Simple example.
From the time of Newton–Huygens, the dualism of light was known
and debated. To set the question:
If we ask how can the wave become a particle, the question will be paradoxical.
But if we ask how the particle can create waves, the question will be logical.
For over 300 years there has been no one that formulated such a question.

[Epsilon=One]

If we ask how can the wave become a particle, the question will be paradoxical.
But if we ask how the particle can create waves, the question will be logical.You well may be correct; however, it is far more important to understand how a wave becomes a particle. Such is the essence of Pulsoid Theory (http://www.physicsmathforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=63).

[Epsilon=One]

The Old Philosophical Problem.

The dispute on the divisibility of a particle has been conducted from ancient times.
There were two opposing views:
1) a particle can be divided infinitely,
2) the division of a particle comes to an end when it reaches the ultimate particlePulsoid Theory (http://www.physicsmathforums.com/showthread.php?t=128) argues that the smallest object that has the properties of mass is the Soloid (http://www.physicsmathforums.com/showthread.php?t=172) (analogous to the "quark"); the Soloid (http://www.physicsmathforums.com/showthread.php?t=172) is composed of waves that resonate and reflect in a manner that is observed as mass.

Also, the particle/wave duality of light is a misinterpretaion of the data, which is actually a photon detector capturing the hyper-relativistic pulsing of a Pulsoid (http://www.physicsmathforums.com/showthread.php?t=98).

[socratus]

The tree is covered with a lot of leaves.
The leaves rustle, speak, argue among themselves.
But shouldn't they know that the roots feed them?
Physicists behave as leaves.
They rustle, speak, argue among themselves.
But they forget the roots of science, namely that we build the base
of a science on abstract ideas.
The base of the classical mechanics is constructed on abstract
Separate absolute space and abstract separate absolute time of Newton.
The base of thermodynamics is constructed on the abstract
ideal gas theory.
The base of the theory of radiation is constructed on
the abstract black body theory.
The base of SRT is constructed on the abstract theory
of four-dimensional space theory.
On this abstract base, physicists build a concrete building of
science and are surprised when they discover paradoxes in it.
But in nature there are no paradoxes observed.
Something is not in order with logical thinking.
It is necessary to stop, look back and
to reconsider the abstract base of science.
But everyone is in a hurry to try to understand reality,
and they create new abstraction. It is a way to “mad infinity”.
Therefore we live in the world of abstraction, of paradoxes,
in the Orwell,s world.
How to break off this circuit of abstraction?

[socratus]

Albert Einstein once remarked:
"The greatest trouble in the world is the idea of a personal God!"
* * *
"What is your flash, Khayyam?
Tent where for overnight's stop,
As a wandering shah, the spirit did a stop".
/ Omar al-Khayyam. /
* * *
The doctrine of a personal God could never be refuted by science.

[socratus]

The most simple design, which was created by the God, is atom of hydrogen.
The most complex design, which was created by the God, is the Man.
The Man is alive essence.
Animals, bird, fish are alive essences.
And an atom?
And atom is also alive design.
The atom of hydrogen lives 12 minutes.
And someone a long time ago has already said, that if
to give suffices time to atom of hydrogen, he will turn into Man.
Therefore, the one, who creates a general picture of Life,
must consider development of evolution of Life from atom up to the Man.
* * *
Once upon a time, in the beginning, there was one "single point " accidentally.
Then it has caught a cold accidentally and has blown up: Big Bang " has taken place.
It was the reason of accidental creation of some hundreds
(thousands) kinds of elementary particles and their girlfriends - antiparticles.
Then stars were formed accidentally.
Then the Planet the Earth was formed accidentally.
Then atom of hydrogen was accidentally formed.
Then complex atom was accidentally formed.
Then was accidentally formed vegetative and fauna.
Then the man was created accidentally.
And this man can accidentally think logically.
But of course, unfortunately, not always.
* * *
What was one "single point " surrounded with?
EMPTINESS- NOTHING….!!!
Ok!
But why does everyone speak about EMPTINESS- NOTHING
In common phrases rather than in specific, concrete terms?
I wonder why nobody has written down this EMPTINESS- NOTHING
in the form of a physical formula ? You see, every schoolboy knows that
is possible to express the EMPTINESS- NOTHING condition
by the formula T=0K.
From only this simple physical parameter I create a general picture of Genesis.
Best wishes.
Socratus

[socratus]

Now we build the base of a science on abstract ideas.
The base of the classical mechanics is constructed on abstract
separate absolute space and abstract separate absolute time of Newton.
The base of thermodynamics is constructed on the abstract
ideal gas theory.
The base of the theory of radiation is constructed on
the abstract black body theory.
The base of SRT is constructed on the abstract theory
of four-dimensional space theory.
On this abstract base, physicists build a concrete building of
science and are surprised when they discover paradoxes in it.
But may be the abstract ideas are not abstract ones.
* * *
It is consider now, that absolute temperature of the Universe is Т=2,7К.
It is an absolute reference system (now).
But we all know that our Universe is expanding......
This temperature ( Т=2,7К ) is not constant, and continues to decrease and,
hence, in the future will decrease down to Т=0К.
* * *
In the physics models of the Vacuum have been created long time ago.
These are:
1) the Theory of ideal gas.
2) the Theory of absolutely black body.
3) Negative four-dimensional space (Minkowski space - SRT).
There is no need to discover America again,
to build new theories of the Vacuum.
If we want to understand Vacuum it is necessary to ask:
“ What a geometrical and physical parameters
the particles in Vacuum T=0K can have?”

Thanks.
Best wishes.
Socratus.