Pulsoid Theory depends upon unprecedented precision.

[Epsilon=One]

Pulsoid Theory depends upon
Unprecedented Precision
If the hypotenuse of an obtuse Brunardot Ellipse (BE) (http://www.CQthus.com/PT/BE) varies by one unit in a string of some 20 digits, an Ultron Ellipse (http://www.CQthus.com/PT/UE) (UE) bond will not be formed; and, this precision is for only a relatively small Time-Cycle ellipse.

Pulsoid Theory (http://www.CQthus.com/PT/PTis) (PT) achieves a degree of rigorous precision beyond anything possible with QM or GR with Conceptual Unit (http://www.CQthus.com/PT/CU) (CU) accuracy from the Planck limitation to the dimensions of GR's Cosmic values.

At only the 4th level (infinite levels are possible) with simple, algebraic expressions (nothing more complex than the Natural function (http://www.CQthus.com/PT/NF) (NF), x² - x) and simple, geometric constructs (nothing more complex than an ellipsoid), beginning with two, “2,” the absolute, integer precision of non-congruent, related structures is on the order of: 1 in 10^15 (1,068,440,120,932,802).

The order of precision for only several higher levels increases exponentially from that of the first 4 levels.

Sorry! This Thread has not been completed.

Please Bookmark and return to this site often.

If there is an immediate need for information,
please e-mail directly at the below "Click" link.

Every effort will be made to expedite a reply
with the requested information.Please ask questions. :)
With questions it’s possible to know if
comments are logical and convincing;
or whether clarification is required.

If images are missing, "click" the Refresh Icon.
http://www.g2d.us/ws.gifhttp://www.g2d.us/s.gifhttp://www.g2d.us/t.gifhttp://www.g2d.us/m.jpghttp://www.g2d.us/i.gif
http://www.g2d.us/x.jpg

[ste]

It is indeed an exciting leap if we are moving from a field plagued with unproven mathematics to something with as much accuracy as you describe. However, what use is a brand new number system if you have no means of manipulating the universe's data with it? Are all factors of your refined concepts directly measurable? How does pulsoid theory make way for detailed scientific predictions? Can the paths of orbits of bodies be predicted? The ma ss of a particle? The strength of "dark" energy? The Magnitude of forces? How so?

[Epsilon=One]

It is indeed an exciting leap if we are moving from a field plagued with unproven mathematics to something with as much accuracy as you describe.I agree.

However, what use is a brand new number system if you have no means of manipulating the universe's data with it?All data that can be currently manipulated can be manipulated, in much the same manner, with Unimetry (www.CQthus.com/PT/Unimetry). The only salient difference is that the Unimetric system is provable ("One" is a constant rather than undefined); a rather important consideration for theoretical physics and philosophy.

Are all factors of your refined concepts directly measurable?Yes. Accuracy depends on the tools of measurement.

How does pulsoid theory make way for detailed scientific predictions?Most predictions of Pulsoid Theory (www.CQthus.com/PT/PTis) are about 50 years old. They are almost unlimited (maybe a slight exageration). PT predicts accelerating galactic recession; entanglement; non-locality; the mas s of neutrinos; "red-shift" as the consequence of dissipation (still a bit controversial); "half-spin" of fermions; near endless sub-atomic "particles"; "dark" matter; "dark" energy; quasars; gamma-ray bursts; "space" quanta; and the explanations of enigmas that are yet to be accepted such as gravity and an alternative force to the Big Bang; etc., etc..

Can the paths of orbits of bodies be predicted? The ma ss of a particle? The strength of "dark" energy? The Magnitude of forces? How so?Certainly. In the same manner as researchers currently acquire data.

[ste]

All data that can be currently manipulated can be manipulated, in much the same manner, with Unimetry. The only salient difference is that the Unimetric system is provable ("One" is a constant rather than undefined); a rather important consideration for theoretical physics and philosophy.
How does one USE Unimetry, other than determining lengths of line segments when working with ellipses?

[Epsilon=One]

How does one USE Unimetry, other than determining lengths of line segments when working with ellipses?The following statement: "lengths of line segments when working with ellipses?" does not state a function of Unimetry. Parse the first post more carefully.

Unimetry is a system of algebraic geometry, that is derived from the Brunardot Theorem (www.CQthus.com/PT/BT) (BT) (c² = 2v² - s²) and the Pulsoid Theorem (www.CQthus.com/PT/eP2) (v = εP²), that proves the mathematics that symbolically reconciles the Cosmic and micro observations of the Universe in concert with the rationale of Pulsoid Theory (www.CQthus.com/PT/PTis) (PT) and the philosophy of Conceptualism (www.CQthus.com/PT/C).