Talvi Watia
02-03-2007, 02:38 PM
iop.org/EJ/abstract/1751-8121/40/7/003
"Current distribution in systems with anomalous diffusion: renormalization group approach"
Lecomte, Tauber, and Wijland
I am uncertain this will be "the solution".
SU(3) must be used as a simple lie group and show that it holds true for all cases in R4 to show normalization of QCD is ok to perform in QED.
But seriously. It is a rehash of everything we know about the Yang-Mills problem to date. Its like trying to solve QED and turn it into QCD rather than vice-versus. The unanswered question is: do the exact values found in the paper work in AdS space in dimensional sets of R4 - R6. And what do you do with the extra values that are not C = NP exclusions that do not have real 3d Euclidian values?
Its a big mess I have seen no light shed on...
...if anyone has any ideas let me know.
"Current distribution in systems with anomalous diffusion: renormalization group approach"
Lecomte, Tauber, and Wijland
I am uncertain this will be "the solution".
SU(3) must be used as a simple lie group and show that it holds true for all cases in R4 to show normalization of QCD is ok to perform in QED.
But seriously. It is a rehash of everything we know about the Yang-Mills problem to date. Its like trying to solve QED and turn it into QCD rather than vice-versus. The unanswered question is: do the exact values found in the paper work in AdS space in dimensional sets of R4 - R6. And what do you do with the extra values that are not C = NP exclusions that do not have real 3d Euclidian values?
Its a big mess I have seen no light shed on...
...if anyone has any ideas let me know.