Tridimensional time by Enzo Bonacci?

[arianna]

Italian scientific community is in a big turmoil after leaking out news about the proposal of an important award to the time’s tridimensionality proof.
xoomer.alice.it/enzobonacci/sEinstein2.pdf

[Epsilon=One]

Italian scientific community is in a big turmoil after leaking out news about the proposal of an important award to the time’s tridimensionality proof.
xoomer.alice.it/enzobonacci/sEinstein2.pdfThere are some interesting aspects to Enzo Bonacci’s “General Relativity Extension,” such as: a structureless rotating sphere and structureless bodies; however, the discussion appears to be based upon Standard Model concepts that are not entirely valid; such as: General Relativity, black holes, and poorly understood concepts of dimensions.

I have no idea what the definition of esadimensional continuum is. I suspect this is a term coined by Enzo that does not appear to be well defined. Obviously, the theory is likewise muddled, as presented.

The concept of time is not nearly as complex as this theory proposes. The proposed tridimensional aspect is to be expected in an orthogonal environment.

I can find little evidence of an understanding of fundamental physical properties that would justify accounting “for all the known conservation laws” or a discussion of hypergravity and subgravity as “alternative sources of energy.”

What little that is presented seems to be the result of a hyperactive mind interacting with some Standard Model nonsense and unproven mathematics.

[Toptunov]

Dear Arianna,

You know that I’ve already tried to contact your friend in the past but he replied not to be interested, claiming something about pacifism I didn’t truly understand.

If he wants to continue a Peter Pan’s existence by appearing from time to time somewhere or winning some meaningless (academicaly speaking) schoolprizes I am the last one to judge.

If on the contrary he wants to try starting a serious academic confrontation you both know how to contact our group.

As far as I know them, the insight of Italian researchers is amazing, exactly as their ability to lose the consequences of their achievements.

Who can remember Ricci Curbastro or Tullio Levi Civita? Pretty few people compared to Einstein!

Moreover ask yourself why there has not been any great Italian theoretical physicist after Fermi who went to America.

If Enzo wants a place in the physics hall of fame he has to understand that it is almost impossible to succed untill left to his own device.

If on the contrary Enzo doesn’t want anything like that, I can only say it’s a pity: String Theory doesn’t work as expected twenty years ago and his esadimensional model, although needing a great improvement (or I’d rather say a complete foundation) in its mathematical aspects, could be the modern equivalent to Columbus’ Discovery of America.