Dark Matter, book closed

[OfficeShredder]

http://www.nasa.gov/centers/marshall/news/news/releases/2006/06-096.html


The hot gas in this collision was slowed by a drag force, similar to air resistance. In contrast, the dark matter was not slowed by the impact, because it does not interact directly with itself or the gas except through gravity. This produced the separation of the dark and normal matter seen in the data. If hot gas was the most massive component in the clusters, as proposed by alternative gravity theories, such a separation would not have been seen. Instead, dark matter is required.

Hello!

[Epsilon=One]

http://www.nasa.gov/centers/marshall/news/news/releases/2006/06-096.htmlNASA Quote: "The hot gas in this collision was slowed by a drag force, similar to air resistance. In contrast, the dark matter was not slowed by the impact, because it does not interact directly with itself or the gas except through gravity. This produced the separation of the dark and normal matter seen in the data. If hot gas was the most massive component in the clusters, as proposed by alternative gravity theories, such a separation would not have been seen. Instead, dark matter is required."This quote you've provided is in agreement with concepts that have been central to Pulsoid Theory for over fifty years.

Said quote will also serve as an excellent explanation for the Pioneer Anomaly. And, with a bit of insight, the inertial force and accelerating, galactic recession is, thereby, easily understood.

However, the "book" is far from "closed." The stated "gravity theories" must be completely discarded; as they are so far from the mark; they are "not even wrong." The fact that, on anthropic scales, the current voodoo, attraction-at-a-distance theories of gravity appear to work is irrelevant.

The evidence of "Dark Matter" that you refer to does not indicate the pervasiveness of the phenomenon, that is analogous to the undetected Higgs boson, which can be found everywhere; all about . . . at all times.

Physical theories will little change, or change at a very slow pace; there is too much of a vested interest in the misleading, irreconcilable status quo.

[socratus]

Matter and “dark matter"
Fact and Speculation.
=========.
1.
Fact.
The detected material mass of the matter in the Universe is so small
(the average density of all substance in the Universe is approximately
p=10^-30 g/sm^3) that it cannot “ close “ the Universe and therefore
our Universe as whole is “ open”, endless.
But what to do with the infinite Universe the physicists don't know.
Therefore they invented an abstract "dark matter" and " dark energy".
They say: " 90% or more of the matter in the Universe is unseen.
And nobody knows what it is.
2.
Speculation.
Unknown “dark matter “ it is matter which makes up the difference
between observed mass of a galaxies and calculated mass……
which….will …” close “ ….the Universe, as …….
as……the astrophysicists want.
3.
The Dark Matter is another official dogma of our astronomy.
/ V. H. Vergon. /
==============..

[Epsilon=One]

Matter and “dark matter"
Fact and Speculation.
=========.
1.
Fact.
The detected material mass of the matter in the Universe is so small
(the average density of all substance in the Universe is approximately
p=10^-30 g/sm^3) that it cannot “ close “ the Universe and therefore
our Universe as whole is “ open”, endless.
But what to do with the infinite Universe the physicists don't know.
Therefore they invented an abstract "dark matter" and " dark energy".
They say: " 90% or more of the matter in the Universe is unseen.
And nobody knows what it is.Pulsoid Theory clearly explains the genesis of dark matter (www.101123.com/DM).


3.
The Dark Matter is another official dogma of our astronomy.
/ V. H. Vergon. /
==============.."Dark Matter" is far more than dogma.

It is "Dark Matter" that accounts for the compression that is largely responsible for the phenomena that is collectively referred to as "gravity; and, it is "Dark Matter" that when critical compressed accounts for all fermionic and bosonic phenomena.

[C. Michael Turner]

Pulsoid Theory clearly explains the genesis of dark matter (www.101123.com/DM).

"Dark Matter" is far more than dogma.

It is "Dark Matter" that accounts for the compression that is largely responsible for the phenomena that is collectively referred to as "gravity; and, it is "Dark Matter" that when critical compressed accounts for all fermionic and bosonic phenomena.
The fact 1. conslusion is not correct, the universe can be closed and the problem lies in the author's understand of the way in which it can be closed.
Imagine a universe that is a bound point of compressed (potential)energy transitioning to a synchronizing wave of of non compressed (kinetic) energy and with in this process resides the nature of the transitional states of matter and energy all expanding at an increasing rate while also aligning along a single plane. This leads from an initial small ball to a very large spindle to a elongating spindle to eventually a long, long line. It actually explains space and time and gravity as relative because they become functions of a wave generated process and the system remains closed yet newton's F=MxA explains the increasing expanding universe as a constant force whereby mass is decreasing and therefore the remaining shrinking mass continues to gain in acceleration because the initial force is still more or less constant. Time, space and gravity, not a pulling force but a synchronizing force, are observable actions of wave properties of an overlooked fundamental process of all potential energy decaying via the gravitational wave creating space itself and thus a completely closed system in the sense that only energy exists and only with in this process of a universe whose battery is the potential to kinetic energy transfer, time being the change and space being the volume and wave synchronization creating the effect of gravity and the flattening of the elongating universe as the mass aligns to a single plane.

But hey this is just one of many possibilities of a closed system.

[Epsilon=One]

The fact 1. conslusion is not correct, the universe can be closed and the problem lies in the author's understand of the way in which it can be closed. The Universe is not closed. Its locus is congruent with Infinity (www.101123.com/I). How else can you explain accelerating galactic recession?

Imagine a universe that is a bound point of compressed (potential)energy transitioning to a synchronizing wave of of non compressed (kinetic) energy and with in this process resides the nature of the transitional states of matter and energy all expanding at an increasing rate while also aligning along a single plane.The Universe is orthogonal; thus, a single plane is not relevant.

To have compression you must have fermions; an evolved Universe exists before there is compression.

“A synchronizing wave” requires the dimension of “time.” Time has never been defined by academia. The Universe evolved from motion before “time” evolved. See: fundamental, intrinsic time (www.101123.com/FIT) (FIT).

This leads from an initial small ball to a very large spindle to a elongating spindle to eventually a long, long line. It actually explains space and time and gravity as relative because they become functions of a wave generated process and the system remains closedSpace evolves before there is a “wave generated process.”

You are correct about the small “ball”; its radius is the radius of Infinity (www.101123.com/ROI) (ROI), the Elliptical Constant (www.101123.com/EC) (EC). The geometric “spindle” that you mention is actually a dual “envelope” Emergent Ellipsoid (www.101123.com/EEd).

yet newton's F=MxA explains the increasing expanding universe as a constant force whereby mass is decreasing and therefore the remaining shrinking mass continues to gain in acceleration because the initial force is still more or less constant.”More or less” is hardly definitive. What did Newton know of the nature of the Universe in his day? For that matter, what did Einstein know? His theories of relativity were formulated before the Universe’s expansion was known’ let alone its accelerating expansion. It’s nice that you believe in “acceleration”; as thus, you must realize that the Big Bang, which "banged" only once, is a sham.

Time, space and gravity, not a pulling force but a synchronizing force, are observable actions of wave properties of an overlooked fundamental process of all potential energy decaying via the gravitational wave creating space itself and thus a completely closed system in the sense that only energy exists and only with in this process of a universe whose battery is the potential to kinetic energy transfer, time being the change and space being the volume and wave synchronization creating the effect of gravity and the flattening of the elongating universe as the mass aligns to a single plane. These comments are so irreconcilable that they are beyond “not even wrong” . . . much like academic, standard model theory.

Concerning gravity, See: Relative, Hierarchic Compression (www.101123.com/RHC) (RHC).

But hey this is just one of many possibilities of a closed system.Yes, and certainly, they are an excellent example of why a “closed model” system is impractical to the point of being metaphysical.

[rstu956]

Juicy Couture belts 2008 - Designer swimsuits from Juicy Couture belts Click on any photo below to see more belts styles from that group. We Offer 2,500+ Charms. Explore juicy couture belts.

[Ìistikz]

I dont have much time right now, so I cant give you a review Ill try to get around to it later but I will say quite a few paragraphs are a bit too large.

[tuvw269]

Cheap Moncler,Moncler Cheap clothing including Cheap Moncler tops, Cheap Moncler bottoms, Cheap Moncler accessories.