truth2k
11-11-2006, 10:15 PM
From http:astro-ph/0512614
Gravity whose nature is fundamental to the understanding of solar system, galaxies and the structure and evolution of the Universe, is theorized by the assumption of curved spacetime, according to Einsteins general theory of relativity (EGR). Particles which experience gravity only, move on curved spacetime along straight lines (geodesics). The geodesics are determined by curved-spacetime metric. In the last year, I proposed the mirrored version of EGR, the flat-spacetime general relativity (FGR), in which particles move along curved lines on flat spacetime. This puts gravitational study back to the traditional Lagrangian formulation. The Lagragian on flat spacetime is simply taken to be the curved spacetime metric of EGR. In fact, all acclaimed accurate verification of general relativity is the verification of FGR, because relativists when confronting GR to observational data, calculate time, distance, or angle by directly using the coordinates in Schwarzschild solution or in post Newtonian formulation. For example, two famous tests of general relativity are about angles. All mainstream textbooks and papers calculate the angles by directly using the coordinate phi. However, only when spacetime is flat does there exist one coordinate system which has direct meaning of time, distance, angle, and vice verse. This is the famous Riemann theorem when he pioneered the concept of curved space. According to the theorem, all coordinates on a curved space are merely parameters. Real angles and distances have to be calculated by employing coefficients of the spatial metric. If we do follow the geometry of curved spacetime (EGR) then the deflection of light at the limb of the sun is 1.65 arcseconds (Crothers, 2005). The publicly cited value (1.75 arcseconds) which best fits observational data is predicted by FGR. Therefore, the more claims are made that classical tests of general relativity fits data with great accuracy, the more falsified is the curved-spacetime assumption. That is, the claim is specious to EGR. Relativists made three specious claims as collected in the present paper. However, FGR predicts observationally verified results for solar system, galaxies, and the universe on the whole. Because FGR uses the single consistent Lagrangian principle, it is straightforward to show that the possibility is less than one billionth that the assumptions of curved spacetime, black holes, and big bang are true. An experiment is proposed whose results will completely decide the fate of curved spacetime assumption.
----------------
(iv) The Possibility of Curved Spacetime, Black Holes, and Big Bang is Less than One Billionth. You have probably noticed that my FGR is based on very simple principles. Now I calculate the probability that FGR is wrong. FGR generalizes special relativity (e6, event 6). Einsteins general relativity does not generalize SR (special relativity). Because SR is well verified in high energy physics, the probability is less than one hundredth that the requirement, a gravitational theory must generalize SR, is false. My model of the universe predicts many observational facts. Its single principle is that the universe is evolving (e7). The probability is less than one hundredth that the universe is not evolving (e7 is false). My model of the universe involves the single function of time: B(t). The function is arbitrary except satisfying some conditions. Redshifts require increasing B(t) with time, the condition (36). Decreasing speed of light requires that B(t) satisfies the condition (40). The simple conditions (36) and (40) guarantee that the existence of the unique inertial frame of the universe (e1), the redshifts (not blueshifts) of galaxies (e2), the Hubble redshift-distance law (e3), the decreasing light-speed which resolves big bang difficulties (e4), and the accelerating universe (e5). These predictions of independent observational cosmological facts based on the two conditions of single arbitrary function are certainly not an accident. Therefore, the probability that my model of the universe is not scientific truth is less than one millionth. Because these observational facts and the principles are independent events, the probability that FGR is false is less than one billionth:
1/1000000 x 1/100 x 1/100 x < 1/1,000,000,000.
That is, the possibility that the assumptions of curved spacetime, black holes, and big bang are true, is less than one billionth.
Gravity whose nature is fundamental to the understanding of solar system, galaxies and the structure and evolution of the Universe, is theorized by the assumption of curved spacetime, according to Einsteins general theory of relativity (EGR). Particles which experience gravity only, move on curved spacetime along straight lines (geodesics). The geodesics are determined by curved-spacetime metric. In the last year, I proposed the mirrored version of EGR, the flat-spacetime general relativity (FGR), in which particles move along curved lines on flat spacetime. This puts gravitational study back to the traditional Lagrangian formulation. The Lagragian on flat spacetime is simply taken to be the curved spacetime metric of EGR. In fact, all acclaimed accurate verification of general relativity is the verification of FGR, because relativists when confronting GR to observational data, calculate time, distance, or angle by directly using the coordinates in Schwarzschild solution or in post Newtonian formulation. For example, two famous tests of general relativity are about angles. All mainstream textbooks and papers calculate the angles by directly using the coordinate phi. However, only when spacetime is flat does there exist one coordinate system which has direct meaning of time, distance, angle, and vice verse. This is the famous Riemann theorem when he pioneered the concept of curved space. According to the theorem, all coordinates on a curved space are merely parameters. Real angles and distances have to be calculated by employing coefficients of the spatial metric. If we do follow the geometry of curved spacetime (EGR) then the deflection of light at the limb of the sun is 1.65 arcseconds (Crothers, 2005). The publicly cited value (1.75 arcseconds) which best fits observational data is predicted by FGR. Therefore, the more claims are made that classical tests of general relativity fits data with great accuracy, the more falsified is the curved-spacetime assumption. That is, the claim is specious to EGR. Relativists made three specious claims as collected in the present paper. However, FGR predicts observationally verified results for solar system, galaxies, and the universe on the whole. Because FGR uses the single consistent Lagrangian principle, it is straightforward to show that the possibility is less than one billionth that the assumptions of curved spacetime, black holes, and big bang are true. An experiment is proposed whose results will completely decide the fate of curved spacetime assumption.
----------------
(iv) The Possibility of Curved Spacetime, Black Holes, and Big Bang is Less than One Billionth. You have probably noticed that my FGR is based on very simple principles. Now I calculate the probability that FGR is wrong. FGR generalizes special relativity (e6, event 6). Einsteins general relativity does not generalize SR (special relativity). Because SR is well verified in high energy physics, the probability is less than one hundredth that the requirement, a gravitational theory must generalize SR, is false. My model of the universe predicts many observational facts. Its single principle is that the universe is evolving (e7). The probability is less than one hundredth that the universe is not evolving (e7 is false). My model of the universe involves the single function of time: B(t). The function is arbitrary except satisfying some conditions. Redshifts require increasing B(t) with time, the condition (36). Decreasing speed of light requires that B(t) satisfies the condition (40). The simple conditions (36) and (40) guarantee that the existence of the unique inertial frame of the universe (e1), the redshifts (not blueshifts) of galaxies (e2), the Hubble redshift-distance law (e3), the decreasing light-speed which resolves big bang difficulties (e4), and the accelerating universe (e5). These predictions of independent observational cosmological facts based on the two conditions of single arbitrary function are certainly not an accident. Therefore, the probability that my model of the universe is not scientific truth is less than one millionth. Because these observational facts and the principles are independent events, the probability that FGR is false is less than one billionth:
1/1000000 x 1/100 x 1/100 x < 1/1,000,000,000.
That is, the possibility that the assumptions of curved spacetime, black holes, and big bang are true, is less than one billionth.