PDA

View Full Version : Time


Epsilon=One
08-12-2005, 11:22 AM
Time

Time is one of the most fundamental of the descriptive dimensions. Time is, also, at its root, the most enigmatic. The word "spacetime" ill serves either the concept of space or the concept of time. (For the concept of space, See: Dyosphere (www.101123.com/Dyo).)

However, time is most easily defined. Time is that which is measured by a “clock.”

There are many different types of “clocks” that measure many different things.

Thus, there are many different “times” that are often only related by the fact that they are measured by a “clock.”

The word “clock” is placed in quotes to indicate that the connotations for the word are many and often not too closely related. Each type of “clock” must be carefully defined before there is an understanding of what it measures and what is meant by its measurement that is referred to, rather loosely, as “time.”

“Clocks” generally consist of three major components: 1.) A power source; 2.) A unit of measurement; and, 3.) An escapement.

A few types of “clocks” which are all dissimilar and measure different definitions of time are: sand filled hour glasses, water clocks (clepsydras), sun dials, pendulum clocks, various spring clocks, orbiting celestial bodies, rotating celestial bodies, oscillating crystals, atoms, light waves, etc.

Also, cyclic and linear are two forms of time which are usually commingled when considering the concept.

The most fundamental concept of time which underlies all manifestations is referred to as fundamental, intrinsic time (www.101123.com/FIT) (FIT). It is the "clock" that measures FIT that creates much of the confusion that creates the problems of theoretical physics. FIT is inexplicable without the concepts of Pulsoid Theory (www.101123.com/PTis).

Fundamental, intrinsic time (www.101123.com/FIT) (FIT) is intrinsic to all phenomena after seminal motion (www.101123.com/SM) itself. FIT is intrinsic to every quantum of space, light, and matter.

The metronome of FIT (www.101123.com/Metro) derives from the Resoloids (www.101123.com/R-loid) created by the complex oscillations of vibration, slide, and swing of Triquametric motion (www.101123.com/TM) which “ticks” are measured by the Conceptual Unit. (www.101123.com/CU)

Thus, the Elliptical Constant (www.101123.com/EC) is the heuristic heart of FIT that sets all universal, rhythmic resonances that makes possible all . . . existence.

©Copyright 2005-2008 by Brunardot. All rights reserved.
Terms: PhysicsMathForums.com, Brunardot, and Pulsoid Theory must be cited.
Sorry! This Thread has not been completed.
Please Bookmark and return to this site often.

If there is an immediate need for information,
please e-mail directly at the below "Click" link.

Please note that any private correspondence
may be edited and anonymously posted unless
requested otherwise.

Every effort will be made to expedite a reply
with the requested information.Please ask questions. :)With questions it’s possible to know if
comments are logical and convincing;
or whether clarification is required......http://1.g2d.us/e.gifhttp://7.g2d.us/e.jpghttp://2.g2d.us/e.gifhttp://3.g2d.us/e.gifhttp://4.g2d.us/e.gifhttp://5.g2d.us/e.gif
..........http://6.g2d.us/e.gif
..........If images don’t display, "click" the Refresh Icon.

Mr. Robin Parsons
08-15-2006, 12:37 PM
© Mr. Robin Parsons Kingston Ontario Canada MMVI

Originally posted Here (http://physicsmathforums.com/showthread.php?t=970&page=3&pp=10) Post #21

So Black Eyes, you say you can conceptualize POOPERS explaination of the 'Perfection' of his 'meter/rate' of time, mathematically Perfect! ...just Like the "rod that translates, through space, ....Perfectly, it too fails to describe 'reality' (Energy/Matter) accurately mathematically ...sorta, as what it does define quite well, is contained within a "Fuzzy/Fuzzing/Fuzzying" effect, a Metaphysical Rule actually, but not intrisically mathematical, although you can sorta use math, to prove it by 'Statistically Relevant Patterns", (these 'one(s)' being different from these ' 1's ' ) but what you will find is What is Happening, now, oooops its' already changed ....by the time you have 'Done the math'

"Intrinsic Time" is Actually a "Timing" (Believe it or not, it varies...Sorta, cause you can use any standard you want and it works ..sorta, so (I)'ll take the entire History of Creation as One tick of the Clock ..the first one....) the Nearest we ALL know of is Lightspeed, (c) while we await the possibility to determine if it is truly consistent across the Spans of Space, by testing it (I) would suppose.

Epsilon=One
08-15-2006, 06:51 PM
"Intrinsic Time" is Actually a "Timing" (Believe it or not, it varies...Sorta, cause you can use any standard you want and it works ..sorta...If you delete the "weasel" word "sorta," which is deceptive, the quote reads: ""Intrinsic Time" is Actually a "Timing" (Believe it or not, it varies......cause you can use any standard you want and it works..."; and, as such the statement is: entirely incorrect as to what is the definition of fundamental, intrinsic time (http://www.CQthus.com/PT/Time) (FIT). Of course, Mr. Robin Parsons may be refering to some "Intrinsic Time" that he has failed to define.

FIT is the timing mechanism of the "clock" that establishes the subatomic harmony that coordinates all the motions that keep the manifestations of Reality (http://www.CQthus.com/PT/Reality) from complete chaos.

FIT has only one "standard"; and that "standard" is the Conceptual Unit (http://www.CQthus.com/PT/CU) (CU).

...so (I)'ll take the entire History of Creation as One tick of the Clock ..the first one....) the Nearest we ALL know of is Lightspeed, (c) while we await the possibility to determine if it is truly consistent across the Spans of Space, by testing it (I) would suppose.To so suppose is ludicrous.

Mr. Robin Parsons
08-15-2006, 11:01 PM
© Mr. Robin Parsons :cool: Kingston Ontario Canada MMVI


To so suppose is ludicrous.
Now I agree with you, what you suppose/propose is ludicrous!

Not unlike you....

Now....


GO
AWAY

Epsilon=One
08-16-2006, 03:20 PM
Now I agree with you, what you suppose/propose is ludicrous!

Not unlike you....Now that you have finally posted a topical comment, can you explain what you don't understand about fundamental, intrinsic time (FIT); or, precisely, what you find ludicrous about the concept.

There is no need for any ad hominem rejoinders or your usual histrionics; my concern is that the Viewers can better understand your position.

Mr. Robin Parsons
09-25-2006, 10:23 AM
© Mr. Robin Parsons :cool: Kingston Ontario Canada MMVI


Please take note: the "YUTZ" Immediately above is on My "Ignore list" so if anything is being stated in reference to me or any of my previous postings, (I) have "not a clue" (can not see it, other then, it lists his name as "there"/{here} ) and (I) DO NOT WANT TO RESPOND OR ENCOURAGE TO SUCH AN ARROGANT INVASIONARY HIDDEN PEACOCK

(Watch out for his FALSE information too)

Epsilon=One
09-25-2006, 09:07 PM
Please take note: the "YUTZ" Immediately above is on My "Ignore list" so if anything is being stated in reference to me or any of my previous postings, (I) have "not a clue" (can not see it, other then, it lists his name as "there"/{here} ) and (I) DO NOT WANT TO RESPOND OR ENCOURAGE TO SUCH AN ARROGANT INVASIONARY HIDDEN PEACOCKI believe that I would rather be a “PEACOCK” than an ostrich with its head in the sand.

Hopefully, your above statement can be construed as meaning you no longer will waste my time with your distortions.

Your continuing behavior is beyond the norm for civilized dialogue. Though you don’t seem to understand the Renaissance spirit of this forum, I hope you appreciate that spirit; as nowhere else would such personal, off-topic attacks and diatribe be tolerated.

(Watch out for his FALSE information too)Ad hominem argument is weak; if you are going to make spurious charges, you should be able to back them up. Exactly what statement of mine that I have made concerning physics, math, or philosophy do you find “FALSE”? If such is the case, I would very much like to correct it.

ste
10-04-2006, 12:31 AM
What IS the "clock" which measures FIT? If the elliptical constant is the escapement which regulates the clock that measures FIT, and the Conceptual Unit is the unit which time is measured in, where then, is its power source?

Epsilon=One
10-04-2006, 06:31 AM
What IS the clock which measures FIT? If the elliptical constant is the escapement which regulates the clock that measures FIT, and the Conceptual Unit is the unit which time is measured in, where then, is its power source?The closest analogy for the "clock" of FIT is the Pulsoid (http://www.CQthus.com/PT/P).

The "power source" is seminal motion, which is derived from Infinity (http://www.CQthus.com/PT/I). The phenomena is referred to as the Unified Concept (http://www.CQthus.com/PT/UC) (UC); first discussed with Philip Morrison in the Spring of 1955.

ste
05-09-2007, 12:09 AM
Why does the unit for time remain constant, regardless of the complex resonances that occur?

Epsilon=One
05-09-2007, 01:08 AM
Why does the unit for time remain constant, regardless of the complex resonances that occur?The unit of time is the Conceptual Unit (www.CQthus.com/PT/CU) (CU) defined by the Elliptical Constant (www.CQthus.com/PT/EC) (EC) that remains constant regardless of the number of pulses, ellipticalness, or the size of a Pulsoid (www.CQthus.com/PT/P).