Epsilon=One
08-12-2005, 09:52 AM
Conceptual Relativity (CR)
Conceptual Relativity (CR) is another term for Pulsoid Theory (http://www.physicsmathforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=63) (PT).
CR connotes a difference from that relativity as proposed by SR and GR.
The concept of relativity is one of the most important concepts that has ever been proposed such that the mind can perceive the counter-intuitive enigmas required to rationalize Reality.
However, there are serious flaws in both SR and GR; CR connotes the concepts of Relativity without said flaws.
A few of the major flaws are: that the speed of light is constant. This is ludicrous on its face. Only the poorly understood concept of time has the constancy of a metronome. The variation in light's speed is too subtle for anthropic detection. You might say that the structure of light, to an anthropoid, is that of a hyper-elongated ellipsoid that cyclically gives the illusion of existing and not existing as its complex oscillations approach the hyper-relativistic speeds of the duality of Infinity.
Thus, another flaw is noted: that the limit of speed is that of light. Also, ludicrous, as aptly demonstrated by EPR and observed non-local phenomena. Why should anything be limited to contrived speeds that are other than the duality of Infinity: motionlessness (the infinitesimal) . . . and infinite speed (that of gravity and the most fundamental pulses of Nature).
Another serious flaw: GR has no structural force that is exactly counter to gravity. Einstein tried with the Cosmological Constant (CC); but, he knew that a constant force could not counter-balance an accelerating force; thus, when Einstein eliminated the CC a gaping flaw remained in GR, which is a quite simplistic manner of describing the complexity of the Cosmos. Today's many Cosmic enigmas and anomalies demonstrate, observationally, how inadequate GR actually is.
Consequently, because of major flaws of reasoning SR and GR are rife with many other flaws that are inconsistent with Nature.
Conceptual Relativity (CR) connotes relativity without the flaws of SR and GR, which flaws no one understood better than . . . Einstein. Why else did he spend the major part of his adult life trying to reconcile SR and GR with one another and Reality . . . unsuccessfully? Who first proposed the EPR gedunken?
Sorry! This Thread is only partially completed.
Please Bookmark and return to this site often.
If there is an immediate need for information,
please e-mail directly at the below "Click" link.
Every effort will be made to expedite a reply
with the requested information.Please ask questions. :)
With questions it’s possible to know if
comments are logical and convincing;
or whether clarification is required.
......http://www.g2d.us/ws.gifhttp://7.g2d.us/e.jpghttp://www.g2d.us/s.gifhttp://www.g2d.us/t.gifhttp://www.g2d.us/m.jpg
Conceptual Relativity (CR) is another term for Pulsoid Theory (http://www.physicsmathforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=63) (PT).
CR connotes a difference from that relativity as proposed by SR and GR.
The concept of relativity is one of the most important concepts that has ever been proposed such that the mind can perceive the counter-intuitive enigmas required to rationalize Reality.
However, there are serious flaws in both SR and GR; CR connotes the concepts of Relativity without said flaws.
A few of the major flaws are: that the speed of light is constant. This is ludicrous on its face. Only the poorly understood concept of time has the constancy of a metronome. The variation in light's speed is too subtle for anthropic detection. You might say that the structure of light, to an anthropoid, is that of a hyper-elongated ellipsoid that cyclically gives the illusion of existing and not existing as its complex oscillations approach the hyper-relativistic speeds of the duality of Infinity.
Thus, another flaw is noted: that the limit of speed is that of light. Also, ludicrous, as aptly demonstrated by EPR and observed non-local phenomena. Why should anything be limited to contrived speeds that are other than the duality of Infinity: motionlessness (the infinitesimal) . . . and infinite speed (that of gravity and the most fundamental pulses of Nature).
Another serious flaw: GR has no structural force that is exactly counter to gravity. Einstein tried with the Cosmological Constant (CC); but, he knew that a constant force could not counter-balance an accelerating force; thus, when Einstein eliminated the CC a gaping flaw remained in GR, which is a quite simplistic manner of describing the complexity of the Cosmos. Today's many Cosmic enigmas and anomalies demonstrate, observationally, how inadequate GR actually is.
Consequently, because of major flaws of reasoning SR and GR are rife with many other flaws that are inconsistent with Nature.
Conceptual Relativity (CR) connotes relativity without the flaws of SR and GR, which flaws no one understood better than . . . Einstein. Why else did he spend the major part of his adult life trying to reconcile SR and GR with one another and Reality . . . unsuccessfully? Who first proposed the EPR gedunken?
Sorry! This Thread is only partially completed.
Please Bookmark and return to this site often.
If there is an immediate need for information,
please e-mail directly at the below "Click" link.
Every effort will be made to expedite a reply
with the requested information.Please ask questions. :)
With questions it’s possible to know if
comments are logical and convincing;
or whether clarification is required.
......http://www.g2d.us/ws.gifhttp://7.g2d.us/e.jpghttp://www.g2d.us/s.gifhttp://www.g2d.us/t.gifhttp://www.g2d.us/m.jpg