The Theory of Moving Dimensions

[astro]

The Theory of Moving Dimensions
Dr. Elliot McGucken
mcgucken@jollyroger.com
In this paper I propose that the time dimension is moving relative to
the three spatial dimensions. Such a concept may be used to explain
physical phenomena encountered in relativity and quantum mechanics,
while offering a path for the unification of Quantum Mechanics and
Relativity.

Simply put, it is not possible to rotate an object into the time
dimension without that object gaining a velocity. Thus the time
dimension itself must be expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions. Another way of looking at this is asking, "Why does
something always move when it is rotated out of the three spatial
dimensions and into the time dimension?" If someone can conduct a
Lorentz transformation on a ruler, and rotate it into the time
dimension without it moving through the three spatial dimensions, I
would very much like to hear about it.

Einstein's two postulates of relativity state:

I. The laws of physical phenomena are the same in all inertial frames.
II. The velocity of light in free space is a universal constant,
independendent of any relative motion of teh source and teh observer.

I propose that the two postulates may be expressed in an alternative
manner, by stating the following law of moving dimensions:

I. The time dimension is moving relative to the three spatial
dimensions.


This can be shown illustrated in several ways: Consider an expression
for the space-time interval of zero length, or of the null vector,
which traces a photon's path through space-time:

x^2+y^2+z^2-c^2t^2=0
or
x^2+y^2+z^2=c^2t^2

Which for one spatial dimension becomes
x^2=c^2t^2

or x=ct

by taking the derivative of both sides with respect to t, we get

dx/dt = d/dt (ct) = c

so

dx/dt = c

And hence the time rate of change of the spatial dimension relative to
the time rate of change of the time dimension is equal to the velocity
of light.

ct| /
| /
| /
| /
| /
|/_______________
x

Also, if we trace the path of a photon on a space-time diagram, the
only way for a photon to remain stationary in space time is to move at
the speed of light, or to keep up with the expanding time dimension.
The null vector, which represents a vector of zero length in
space-time, can only imply zero movement through space-time. Even
though a photon moves through space at a velocity equal to C, it stays
stationary in space-time. Is it not strange at first that in order to
remain stationary in space time, a photon appears move at the speed of
light through space? This is only because the time dimension itself is
moving relative to space.

Einstein proclaimed that all objects travel through space-time at c.
Even though we perceive a ruler along the x axis to be stationary, it
is yet traveling through space-time at the fixed speed of c, implying
that time is moving through it. Rotate it towards the y axis, and its
projection upon the x axis shortens, yet it still appears to be
stationary, and it is still traveling through space-time at the rate
of c. Rotate it into the time dimension, and it's projection along
the x axis still shortens, but now it begins to move through the three
spatial dimensions, while maintaining the fixed speed of c through
space-time. Again, we see it move through the three spatial
dimensions as it is rotated into the time dimension because the time
dimension is moving relative to the three spatial dimensions.

As Brian Greene points out in the Appendix to Chapter 2 of The Elegant
Universe, we note that from the space-time position 4-vector
x=(ct,x1,x2,x3), we can create the velocity 4-vector u=dx/d(tau),
where tau is the proper time defined by
d(tau)^2=dt^2-c^-2(dx1^2+dx2^2+dx3^2). Then the "speed through
space-time" is the magnitude of the 4-vector u,
((c^2dt^2-dx^2)/(dt^2-c^-2dx^2))^(1/2), which is identically the speed
of light c. Now, we can rearrange the equation
c^2(dt/d(tau))^2-(dx/d(tau))^2=c^2 to be c^2(d(tau)/dt))^2
+(dx/d(tau))^2=c^2. This shows that an increase of an object's speed
through space, (dx/d(tau))^2)^(1/2)= dx/d(tau) must be accompanied by
a decrease in d(tau)/dt which is the object's speed through time,
which also may be considered the rate at which time elapses on it's
own clock d(tau) or the proper time, as compared with that on our
stationary clock dt.

As an object moves through space, it is rotated into the time
dimension, and less wave fronts of time are allowed to pass through it
relative to a stationary object, which bears the full brunt of wave
fronts. Thus a moving clock will run slower, as all clocks are based
on the probabilistic emission and propagation of photons, and as a
moving clock catches up with the expanding wavefront of time, the
chance that a photon will be emitted without being reabsorbed is
diminished.
Thus it is shown that the spatial and temporal dimensions are moving
relative to one-another. The laws and equations of relativity and
quantum mechanics rest upon this fundamental nature of physical
reality.

Relativistic and quantum mechanical phenomena can be accounted for by
the underlying nature of the relatively moving dimensions. Time
dialation, relativistic length contraction, and the equivalence of
mass and energy can all be seen to derive from this concept of moving
dimensions. The statistical wave nature of matter and energy also
rests upon the relative motion of the underlying dimensions.

As one rotates into the time dimension, one becomes more orthogonal to
the spatial dimensions, and thus one's length contracts. And too, as
the time dimension is moving relative to the spatial dimensions, one
begins to move.

Wave-particle duality and quantum mechanical probabilistic behavior
can be accounted for by the relative motion between the dimensions, in
which both particles and waves exist. Feynman's many-paths integrals,
reflecting the notion that a particle travels all paths, can be
accounted for by the fact that until it interacts with other matter in
the three spatial dimensions, there is a probability that a particle
or photon may exist as a pure wave, rotated into the fourth dimension,
moving along with expanding time, independent of the spatial
dimensions. So it is that radiowaves may pass through walls, carrying
energy and thus mass.

The second law of thermodynamics (increasing entropy) can be accounted
for with the fact that all particles and matter have a chance of
existing in a dimension expanding at a constant rate, equally in all
dimensions, relative to the rest. The spherical symmetry of a photon's
wavefront may be viewed as the result of matter having been rotated
into the time dimension--the matter has become orthogonal to the
spatial dimensions, and it is now expanding along with time, equally
in all directions.

Einstein's second postulate, stating that the velocity of light is a
universal constant, holds to be true because the velocity of light is
merely the rate of propagation of a dimension relative to the other
dimensions. Although this relative rate of propagations between
dimensions may vary, we shall always interpret it as a constant,
because we are used to measuring the velocity of the propagation of
energy relative to the velocity of the propagation of energy, which we
write as c.

Relativistic time dialation occurs because as an object approaches the
speed of light, the object approaches the speed of the propagation of
energy. As time is measured with regards to the propagation of energy,
such as the emission of a photon (in an electrical circuit or a
mechanical spring) or or the occurence of a random event which
liberates energy, less time will pass for an entity which is
propagating at a rate which is close to the propagation of energy
itself. As an entity gains velocity, it is roated into the moving time
dimension, and it in a sense it catches up with the dimension.

Relativistic length contraction is always accompanied by an increase
in velocity, as the probability that each quantum of the object
resides in the time dimension is increased. Relativistic length
contraction can be accounted for by the fact that as an object gains
velocity its probabilistic wave function, or its essence, is rotated
into the time dimension, and thus it appears shorter from the
persepective of the three spatial dimensions. At the speed of light
the object would have to be a photon, so as to be completely absent
from the spatial dimension, as any presence or probability that a
particle is in the spatial dimnsion means that there is a probability
that the time dimension will expand without carrying it along, in
essence leaving it behind for that moment it exists in the spatial
dimension.

[astro]

Any material entity gains more energy as its velocity increases, and
relativity demonstrates that the entity also gains more mass. When
energy is added to an entity, it may also appears as mass, as that
energy has a finite chance of interacting with the spatial dimensions.

All matter has a spatial component, or a probability of interacting
with space, whereas a photon only interacts with that which is in the
time dimension.

In order to cause an entity to move, quanta of energy must be added to
it, and the entity will thus gain a new probabilities for existing in
the space and time dimensions, as its overall wavefunction, including
its mass and energy, is rotated out of the spatial dimension and into
the time dimension. This rotation into the time dimension will be
proportional to the amount of energy that has been added.

As only photons can exist purely in the spatial dimension, no entities
but for photons can ever reach the speed of light, as all matter has a
finite chance of existing purely in the spatial dimension. This
property gives rise to the concept of mass, as to exist in the spatial
dimension curves the fabric of space-time about the existence.

An entity moves through space-time according to its probability of
existing in space and time. The more energy a given entity has, the
more likely it is to exist in the time dimension, or be moving along
in the dimension which is expanding relative to the spatial
dimensions. Hence its greater velocity, and also its augmented chance
of interacting with matter over a fixed distance. This increased
chance of interacting with matter over a given distance can be
associated with a shorter deBroglie wavelength or a higher frequency.
A more energetic photon has a higher frequency, as it is composed of
more substance, and more momenergy must pass a given point at any
given time. A less energetic photon carries less momenergy, and thus
there is a smaller chance of it interacting with matter as it passes
on by. A more energetic photon has a higher probability of interacting
with matter as it passes it by, as its shorter wavelngth and higher
frequency represent a greater, more persistant existence in
space-time.

A photon has no spatial dimensions, as it is matter rotated into the
time dimension. Einstein's famous equation which expresses the
equivalnce between matter and energy:

E=mc^2

holds true because radiative energy, consisting of photons, is merely
matter which has been rotaed tinto the expanding time dimension.

In quantum mechanics energy is accounted for by the operator which
represents the infinitesimal change with respect to time, while
momentum is accounted for by an operator which represents the
infinitesimal change with respect to space. Both momentum and energy
are defined with the concept of change and probability. And too,
inherent in all waves are the concepts of motion and probability.

Einstein's postulates derive from the fact that in all inertial
reference frames, the relative motions between the dimensions is fixed
at a constant rate, because the relative motion between the dimensions
is measured relative to the relative motion. Thus the laws of physics,
and all physical concepts, which are all fundamentally based on the
concept of motion or change with respect to time, are also fixed in
all interial frames, and the speed of light is constant in all
inertail frames.

As physics concerns itself at all levels with changes relative to both
space and time, it makes sense that all physics, time, motion,
reality, life, and consciousness itself are founded upon a stage which
is endowed with intrinsic motion.

The underlying fabric of all reality, the dimensions themselves, are
moving relative to one another.

I'm treating this as an open-source physics project, if anyone would
like to join me at

[MacM]

Any material entity gains more energy as its velocity increases, and
relativity demonstrates that the entity also gains more mass. When
energy is added to an entity, it may also appears as mass, as that
energy has a finite chance of interacting with the spatial dimensions.

All matter has a spatial component, or a probability of interacting
with space, whereas a photon only interacts with that which is in the
time dimension.

In order to cause an entity to move, quanta of energy must be added to
it, and the entity will thus gain a new probabilities for existing in
the space and time dimensions, as its overall wavefunction, including
its mass and energy, is rotated out of the spatial dimension and into
the time dimension. This rotation into the time dimension will be
proportional to the amount of energy that has been added.

As only photons can exist purely in the spatial dimension, no entities
but for photons can ever reach the speed of light, as all matter has a
finite chance of existing purely in the spatial dimension. This
property gives rise to the concept of mass, as to exist in the spatial
dimension curves the fabric of space-time about the existence.

An entity moves through space-time according to its probability of
existing in space and time. The more energy a given entity has, the
more likely it is to exist in the time dimension, or be moving along
in the dimension which is expanding relative to the spatial
dimensions. Hence its greater velocity, and also its augmented chance
of interacting with matter over a fixed distance. This increased
chance of interacting with matter over a given distance can be
associated with a shorter deBroglie wavelength or a higher frequency.
A more energetic photon has a higher frequency, as it is composed of
more substance, and more momenergy must pass a given point at any
given time. A less energetic photon carries less momenergy, and thus
there is a smaller chance of it interacting with matter as it passes
on by. A more energetic photon has a higher probability of interacting
with matter as it passes it by, as its shorter wavelngth and higher
frequency represent a greater, more persistant existence in
space-time.

A photon has no spatial dimensions, as it is matter rotated into the
time dimension. Einstein's famous equation which expresses the
equivalnce between matter and energy:

E=mc^2

holds true because radiative energy, consisting of photons, is merely
matter which has been rotaed tinto the expanding time dimension.

In quantum mechanics energy is accounted for by the operator which
represents the infinitesimal change with respect to time, while
momentum is accounted for by an operator which represents the
infinitesimal change with respect to space. Both momentum and energy
are defined with the concept of change and probability. And too,
inherent in all waves are the concepts of motion and probability.

Einstein's postulates derive from the fact that in all inertial
reference frames, the relative motions between the dimensions is fixed
at a constant rate, because the relative motion between the dimensions
is measured relative to the relative motion. Thus the laws of physics,
and all physical concepts, which are all fundamentally based on the
concept of motion or change with respect to time, are also fixed in
all interial frames, and the speed of light is constant in all
inertail frames.

As physics concerns itself at all levels with changes relative to both
space and time, it makes sense that all physics, time, motion,
reality, life, and consciousness itself are founded upon a stage which
is endowed with intrinsic motion.

The underlying fabric of all reality, the dimensions themselves, are
moving relative to one another.

I'm treating this as an open-source physics project, if anyone would
like to join me at

As an unqualified professional but one with considerable physics and engineering experience, I want to add a personal note.

I believe that kenetic energy may appear as mass in terms of momentum, etc but it has beenshown that such energy does not appear to enfluence a particles gravity. Hence I do not see it truely as mass.

I believe the concept of relativity is flawed in that the inability to accelerate an object (or the increased energy to acclerate it) are illusionary and do not represent a change in mass at all.

It is more likely that the applied energy suffers a transfer efficiency loss as the relative veloicty between the cource and particle increases.

Consider a car with a maximum speed of 100 Mph pushing another car. It would matter not how large an engine (energy input) you use you would not be able to push the other car any faster than the limit of the pusher.


Particle accelertors use EM to push particles. Since EM has a finite velcoity limit of 'c' it is understandable that once cannot reach 'c' or exceed the velocity of the pushing force.

I believe that the energy accumulates in space behind the particle (is stored in space like the magnetic field of a coil) and has nothing to do with mass of the particle. When stopping the particle that energy catches up and continues to jpush causing the particle to appear to have excess momentum giving the illusion of increased mass above its linear kenetic energy.

This explains why such apparent mass does not also cause gravitational affects.

The idea is that energy becomes bifurcated in its application that is is applied at an angle as velocity increases and this coincides with the Lorentz Contract view of "Rotation" versus actual length contraction.

[fraleysinger]

I have a proton model that has this behavior. I've been wrestling with the problem of what happens when the particle decelerates due to non-EM processes such as a direct hit on another nucleon. We know the externals of what happens from experiment and generally accepted equations.

[william]

Is it possible that with enough energy and a magnetic understanding I could travel to or cross a moving dimensional bubble?And If possible , has it not aready been done. :)

[MacM]

Is it possible that with enough energy and a magnetic understanding I could travel to or cross a moving dimensional bubble?And If possible , has it not aready been done. :)

It seems that such "Worm Hole" affects could be realized. It has to do with "What is distance". In my UniKEF concept distance is linked with energy of seperation both "Quantitatively" and "Qualitatively"

The shortest distance between points would be to accelerate to an energy level equal to that seperation and decelerate to the destination point rest level.

The universe consists of a flowing RCM type background where each observer and enity is at rest to some level of an energy spectrum which exceeds 'c' by many but unknown factors. Exceeding 'c' (which is only theoretically prohibited" by relativity and not a proven fact, one would cease to exist in this dimension but continue to exist at a higher energy level of creation.

It is this variable energy background which generates the "Illusion" of the invariance of light and caused Einstein to conclude Relativity. But it is merely an illusion of the production or observation of light and not a true nature of light itself.

That is I see light as being a form of quantum energy where a source of light excites the UniKEF background up and down the energy spectrum and a photon is nothing more than a form of dimensional binding energy release when the observers (c+v) or (c-v) equals the Lorentz Contraction point of dimensional collapse.

Very much like the flash of Star Trek going into Warp drive.

While there is no mathematical nor experimental data foundation for my concept it resolves many problems and is consistant logically with our observations without the "Counter Intuitive" conclusions of Relativity as a physical reality.

This view supports particle entanglement and gravity being virtually instantaneous, the use of GPS of "Relative Absolute Velocity" of orbit vs SR's "Relative Veloicty" between clocks, tunneling, electron orbit switching without existing inbetween orbits without time of transistion, etc.

[astro]

Dear Rogue Physicist,

You say that my ideas are not original. I have been searching for similar ideas for ten years on the internet, and have not found them. Could you please direct me to some similar ideas? Thanks!

You say, "The basic problem is that if you want to be moving at the speed of light on the time axis in ALL directions, you have to assume the Time Dimension has a special kind of motion, non-directional, or rather all-directional. The only thing that describes this case in my view would be EXPANSION. That is, the Time Dimension would have to be Dilating or Expanding at the speed of Light. In this case, its 'hooks' would always move away at a fixed rate, regardless of other dimensions. This would be something like Einstein's idea of the equivalence of gravity and acceleration. (inertial and gravitational mass)."

I have said many times that the time dimension appears as a spherically symmetric expanding wavefront throughout the three spatial dimensions. A photon, which represents a spherically expanding wavefront, is momenergy rotated fully into time, orthogonal to the three spatial dimensions.

A photon's energy is E=hf. h represents the distance momenergy can be rotated into the time dimension. If you are trying to rotate more momenrgy into the time dimension, the frequency will be higher, representing the fact that you will have more fundamental units of momenergy passing a given point p. So it is that the total momenergy of a photon is E=hf.

h | | |
P
Low energy photon.


h |||||||||||||||||||||||||
P
High energy photon.

The time dimensiuon expands in incremental units of h in all directions equally.

Think Huygen's Principle: as a photon expands, every point of its expanding wavefront expands as a spherically symmetric wavefront. NOTHING EVER ENTERS THE TIME DIMENSION DEEPER THAN h!!!

The expanding time dimension is orthogonal to the three spatial dimensions, but it's only ever h deep!!!

Whenever a photon interacts with matter, it is brought out of the expanding time dimension, and localized in the spatial dimensions. Thus a massless photon, when caught by an electorn in an atom, ads mass to the atom.

I quote myself:

"The second law of thermodynamics (increasing entropy) can be accounted
for with the fact that all particles and matter have a chance of
existing in a dimension expanding at a constant rate, equally in all
dimensions, relative to the rest. The spherical symmetry of a photon's
wavefront may be viewed as the result of matter having been rotated
into the time dimension--the matter has become orthogonal to the
spatial dimensions, and it is now expanding along with time, equally
in all directions."

[Epsilon=One]

In order to cause an entity to move, quanta of energy must be added to it, and the entity will thus gain a new probabilities for existing in the space and time dimensions… This rotation into the time dimension will be proportional to the amount of energy that has been added.How is the “quanta of energy” added? What determines the “units” of this added energy that the rotation is proportional to?

The more energy a given entity has, the
more likely it is to…be moving along in the dimension which is expanding relative to the spatial dimensions. Hence its greater velocity,Where does this variation in energy arise from for the most fundamental “entity”?

In quantum mechanics energy is accounted for by the operator which represents the infinitesimal change with respect to time, while momentum is accounted for by an operator which represents the infinitesimal change with respect to space.What is the “operator”?

As physics concerns itself at all levels with changes relative to both space and time, it makes sense that all physics, time, motion, reality, life, and consciousness itself are founded upon a stage which is endowed with intrinsic motion.I agree concerning the “stage which is endowed with intrinsic motion”; my question is: What is the most fundamental “value” unit that the “changes relative to both space and time” are measured against for their relative value?

The underlying fabric of all reality, the dimensions themselves, are moving relative to one another.Yes. If it exists, it is moving. Why???

I'm treating this as an open-source physics project…Great idea!!!

[Dalibor Gruza]

The character of the photon as real existing point of the three-dimensional space (i.e. with zero spacial dimensions) and the finite energy of the universe is evidently the cause of the maximum speed of light of matters (with nonzero rest mass) and photons (with zero rest mass) in the time-space.

- The speed of a matter (with nonzero rest mass) equal with the speed of light c requires an infinite energy according to the Einstein's special theory of relativity, which results from his equations for the relativistic weight m=m0/square root of [1-(v2/c2)], where v is the speed of matter equal with c, c the speed of light, m0 the rest mass of matter, m the relativistic weight and for energy E= m c2, because m=m0/0=m0/(x/infinite)=m0*infinite/x=infinite, where x and m0 are the finite minus or plus nonzero numbers.

- The matter with nonzero rest mass is composed of the infinite number of points of the three-dimensional space, evidently photons, elements with zero rest mass. The movement of this matter with the speed of light means, that each point of space of this matter, evidently photon should move with the speed of light. Considering nonzero energy of each point of space, evidently each photon, which moves with the speed of light, the infinite energy would be necessary for the infinite points of space creating the matter to start the movement of this matter with the speed of light. Considering, that the universe has evidently the finite rest mass and the speed lower, than the speed of light is, i.e. the finite energy, it is possible to suppose, that the total energy of the universe would not be enough to start the start the movement of this matter with the speed of light. .

- The speed of light of a photon (with zero rest mass) means any finite energy E= mc2 according to the Einstein's special theory of relativity, which results from his equation for the relativistic weight m=m0/the square root of [1-(v2/c2)], where v is the speed of a photon equal with c, c the speed of light, m0 the rest mass of a photon equal with zero, m the relativistic weight, because m=m0/0=0/(-+x/infinite)=(-+x/infinite)/(-+x/infinite)=-+x*infinite/x*infinite, where x is the nonzero finite minus or plus number. The relativistic weight m is then equal with any plus or minus nonzero number according to the result of the quotient and the kind of the infinite in this quotient.

- The above-mentioned piece of knowledge about any energy of a photon with the speed of light results as well from the theory of a photon as a point of the three-dimensional space. Any photon with the speed of light has nonzero energy and it is evidently the point of the space with this speed and energy. The finite number of these points of the space side by side presents a point of the space again, otherwise the number of these points of the space would have to be infinite. It results from it, that the photon with the speed of light as a point of the space composed of any finite number of photons with the speed of light, evidently points of the space has again any finite energy. Considering, that the universe has evidently the finite rest mass and the speed lower, than the speed of light is, i.e. the finite energy, it is possible to suppose, that, even if a photon use the energy of the whole universe, it would reach only the speed of light no the speed higher.

- The photons as the moving points of the space result also from knowledges of the discipline of physics with the name the optics, which keeps a piece of knowledge, that also the rays, which are each other secant, don't interfere each other and they move independently in the environment . This piece of knowledge confirmed by experiences has a name the law of the independence of light rays in physics. The description of photons creating light rays as points of the three-dimensional space corresponds with it, because it would explain the above-mentioned law of the independence of light rays .

[Dalibor Gruza]

see www.cbox.cz/ak-gruza

[Epsilon=One]

see www.cbox.cz/ak-gruzaWhat you have written in your posts and at the website is well thought out and well stated.

However, the "photon" is a creation of something more fundamental than you seem to imply by your definitions; and, that more fundamental phenomena is: the ellipsoidal "envelope" or "packet" that contains the "photon group." "Photons" (A word I don't like because, for many, it connotes a particle; albeit massless.) are resonances created by the hyper-relativistic, intrinsic harmony of complex oscillations of slide, swing, and vibration within their "envelopes."

The resonance exchanges between the "envelope" and its photons are the interruptions that "clock" fundamental, intrinsic time (FIT).

As time allows, I’ll try to comment in more detail regarding your theory.

[Heaven Net]

Any material entity gains more energy as its velocity increases, and
relativity demonstrates that the entity also gains more mass. When
energy is added to an entity, it may also appears as mass, as that
energy has a finite chance of interacting with the spatial dimensions.

All matter has a spatial component, or a probability of interacting
with space, whereas a photon only interacts with that which is in the
time dimension.

In order to cause an entity to move, quanta of energy must be added to
it, and the entity will thus gain a new probabilities for existing in
the space and time dimensions, as its overall wavefunction, including
its mass and energy, is rotated out of the spatial dimension and into
the time dimension. This rotation into the time dimension will be
proportional to the amount of energy that has been added.

As only photons can exist purely in the spatial dimension, no entities
but for photons can ever reach the speed of light, as all matter has a
finite chance of existing purely in the spatial dimension. This
property gives rise to the concept of mass, as to exist in the spatial
dimension curves the fabric of space-time about the existence.

An entity moves through space-time according to its probability of
existing in space and time. The more energy a given entity has, the
more likely it is to exist in the time dimension, or be moving along
in the dimension which is expanding relative to the spatial
dimensions. Hence its greater velocity, and also its augmented chance
of interacting with matter over a fixed distance. This increased
chance of interacting with matter over a given distance can be
associated with a shorter deBroglie wavelength or a higher frequency.
A more energetic photon has a higher frequency, as it is composed of
more substance, and more momenergy must pass a given point at any
given time. A less energetic photon carries less momenergy, and thus
there is a smaller chance of it interacting with matter as it passes
on by. A more energetic photon has a higher probability of interacting
with matter as it passes it by, as its shorter wavelngth and higher
frequency represent a greater, more persistant existence in
space-time.

A photon has no spatial dimensions, as it is matter rotated into the
time dimension. Einstein's famous equation which expresses the
equivalnce between matter and energy:

E=mc^2

holds true because radiative energy, consisting of photons, is merely
matter which has been rotaed tinto the expanding time dimension.

In quantum mechanics energy is accounted for by the operator which
represents the infinitesimal change with respect to time, while
momentum is accounted for by an operator which represents the
infinitesimal change with respect to space. Both momentum and energy
are defined with the concept of change and probability. And too,
inherent in all waves are the concepts of motion and probability.

Einstein's postulates derive from the fact that in all inertial
reference frames, the relative motions between the dimensions is fixed
at a constant rate, because the relative motion between the dimensions
is measured relative to the relative motion. Thus the laws of physics,
and all physical concepts, which are all fundamentally based on the
concept of motion or change with respect to time, are also fixed in
all interial frames, and the speed of light is constant in all
inertail frames.

As physics concerns itself at all levels with changes relative to both
space and time, it makes sense that all physics, time, motion,
reality, life, and consciousness itself are founded upon a stage which
is endowed with intrinsic motion.

The underlying fabric of all reality, the dimensions themselves, are
moving relative to one another.

I'm treating this as an open-source physics project, if anyone would
like to join me at

[cnwholesale]

Like you page!pandora beads discountedpandora beads on ebaypandora beads retiredpandora charm beadspandora glass beads

[0=v.i.]

The Theory of Moving Dimensions
Dr. Elliot McGucken
mcgucken@jollyroger.com
In this paper I propose that the time dimension is moving relative to
the three spatial dimensions. Such a concept may be used to explain
physical phenomena encountered in relativity and quantum mechanics,
while offering a path for the unification of Quantum Mechanics and
Relativity.
...
dimension.

1) In one dimension:
dx1/dt = c
This means that x1 expands with a velocity c (by the way c is altered by time and it is not a universal constant) relative to "time".
2) In three dimensions:
dx1/dt = dx2/dt = dx3/dt = c and dx4/dt = ic
These mean that all dimensions are expanding relative to "time". The three spatial ones with a velocity c (not a universal constant) and the virtual x4 with a velocity ic (not measurable) relative to "time". x4 could not been even conceptualised as it is refererred to a space of more dimensions according to Godel's second incompleteness theorem.
3) dx4/dx1 = dx4/dx2 = dx4/dx3 = i
So NO dimension is moving (metrically) relative to each other.
4) ALL dimensions are moving relative to each other by changing their directions.
Orthogonality that we have imposed to them is only a "scientific trick" we use for our convinience (and our misleading).
(synpan.blogspot.com) (in Greek)

[christainpaul]

The information of all the different parameters you have shared and the theories regarding the time velocity photon and all others i have read the article regarding that so its been really good for me...