a good aproximation of cosmological irradiation

[nalxhal]

Electromagnetic interaction of gravity. Proposal for unified field theory.


ABSTRACT

From this theory arises an equation connects Planck’s constant (h), the speed of light ©, the constant of gravity (G), the constant of electricity (Ke=1/4π.εο ) and Boltzmann’s constant (kbl). The important aspect in this equation is that it arrives at a function with a geometrical content in 10 dimensions of space: forces are added logarithmically. From the following proposals of the theory, we obtain applications with temperatures comparable to the GUT and masses like the Planck mass and the inclusion of the Avogadro number and mass of proton .

http://www.wbabin.net/science/alexandris.pdf

The connection of fine structure constant and proton
(mass and length) with gravity and
1,052mm cosmic microwave background radiation from unified theory

Abstract

By the below analysis arises the substance of fine structure constant and the connection of mole of proton with gravity , also prediction of neutrino energy . using the law of Stefan-Boltzman and our function , we have results in agreement with MCB radiation while Wien’s law cannot. We can propose a model for universe in extra dimension and the connection of proton and positron in a process of particle creation

http://www.wbabin.net/science/alexandris5.pdf


EVOLUTIONARY UNFOLDING OF NATURAL AND BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS

Summary of a philosophical book

ABSTRACT

Analysing the subject , referring to the ‘pictorial figure’(potential,iconic virtuelles forms), I mean the elements allying the various figures of evolution, both in the natural world and in society. This happens so as each evolutionary vault is accompanied by a corresponding evolution to the latter pictorial figures, while the simple variations of the pictorial figures tally to exiguous alterations, such as the creation of species or some kind of molecular alteration.

http://www.wbabin.net/science/alexandris6.pdf

Author : Nikos Alexandris

my articles : http//www.cerglobal.org

[Epsilon=One]

unified theory by Alexandris Nikos

http://www.cerglobal.org/Results.tpl?CATEGORY=46&cart=11587318579396517&startat=1There are some very interesting aspects to your theory.

I see little application to observed phenomena and a tremendous amount of symbolic manipulation without much fundamental proof. This may be my oversight or your succinctness. How does your theory explain half-spin?; and time?

I am interested as to how you tie your theory to Cosmology. What is the genesis of the Big Bang?; and, How does it explain accelerating, galactic recession?

[nalxhal]

There are some very interesting aspects to your theory.

I see little application to observed phenomena and a tremendous amount of symbolic manipulation without much fundamental proof. This may be my oversight or your succinctness. How does your theory explain half-spin?; and time?

I am interested as to how you tie your theory to Cosmology. What is the genesis of the Big Bang?; and, How does it explain accelerating, galactic recession?

my theory have not any reference of half-spin. the time incloudes two dimensions as you can see in above site and in some part of my philosophical book at
http://www.geocities.com/nalxhal/time

[Epsilon=One]

my theory have not any reference of half-spin. the time incloudes two dimensions as you can see in above site and in some part of my philosophical book at
http://www.geocities.com/nalxhal/timeIf you expect your theory to be more than a very minor footnote to the Standard Models and the history of physics, as you seem to imply with your promotion, you should try to improve upon what the SMs have difficulty explaining.

The different spins of fermions and bosons is well docu mented, [prior word formated to avoid SPAM filter] your theory should explain why half-spin is so geometrically complex or counterintuitive.

I find nothing in your work that either clearly or persuasively explains time. To your credit, no one else does either. However, no theory can expect to be very universal without a clarification of "exactly" what time is. No one was more confused about time than Einstein; and no one of élite stature has wanted to dispute his undeniable genius concerning "spacetime."

Before you work too hard on extending your theory to current enigmatic observations, work backwards . . . to defining the fundamentals of your hypotheses.

[nalxhal]

http://www.thescienceforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=22449#22449

[Epsilon=One]

The proof of the theory

The relation of length and temperature gives us the hope of examining whether the system works at low temperarures T.lg = 5,755?10^-3.m.K . The system seems to work at the Planck temperature as the proton’s temperature in a diversity of 10^32.K- 10^12.K - why not the lower of them?Your theory must, also, be able to explain the high-energy, background radiation that has been verified by COBE and denied for about 18 years.

I suspect your theory's observed, low-energy background radiation is what remains of long ago gamma-ray bursts; or something similar that involves the dissipation (deceleration of light).

As long as you continue to believe there was a Big Bang, your theories will get nowhere beyond the miasma of the Standard Models (SM).

You might find these posts interesting:Quantitative Proof of Pulsoid Theory (http://www.CQthus.com/PT/Proof)

Quantum constants' relation to Natural integers (http://www.CQthus.com/PT/QC)

[nina060609]

这是新加的空白文章1，可以在UBB可视化编辑器中，添加和修改文章内容。