Attraction-at-a-distance: voodoo science

[Epsilon=One]

Attraction-at-a-distance: voodoo science

Attraction-at-a-distance: voodoo science; an illusion.

Gravitational attraction as described by Newton (He actually thought it was transcendental.) and GR (Einstein knew it was inexplicable.) is ludicrous on its face. To begin, it describes at least six forces (reach, grab, and pull for each of at least 2 bodies).

Actually, what is referred to as gravitational attraction is several phenomena that act directly on the object; as all forces must!

See: Relative, Hierarchic Compression (www.101123.com/RHC) (RHC) and Confluent Congruence (www.101123.com/CC) (CC).

©Copyright 2005-2008 by Brunardot. All rights reserved.
Terms: PhysicsMathForumsDialogue21.com, Brunardot, and Pulsoid Theory must be cited.
Sorry! This Thread has not been completed.
Please Bookmark and return to this site often.

If there is an immediate need for information,
please e-mail directly at the below "Click" link.

Please note that any private correspondence
may be edited and anonymously posted unless
requested otherwise.

Every effort will be made to expedite a reply
with the requested information.Please ask questions. :)With questions it’s possible to know if
comments are logical and convincing;
or whether clarification is required......http://1.g2d.us/e.gifhttp://7.g2d.us/e.jpghttp://2.g2d.us/e.gifhttp://3.g2d.us/e.gifhttp://4.g2d.us/e.gifhttp://5.g2d.us/e.gif
..........http://6.g2d.us/e.gif
..........If images don’t display, "click" the Refresh Icon.

[ste]

Attraction-at-a-distance: voodoo science; an illusion.

And how does RHC illustrate that it is an illusion?


Actually, what is referred to as gravitational attraction is several phenomena that act directly on the object; as all forces must!

Phenomena, such as what?

[Epsilon=One]

And how does RHC illustrate that it is an illusion?Gravitational attraction-at-a-distance is an illusion because all forces must act directly on their object. You might say that gravitational waves don't exist; and therefore, GR gravity is illusional . . . as is spacetime.

Conventional gravity, as defined by the Standard Models, is at the minimum six forces: Reach, Grasp, and Pull from 2 objects; not to mention that the force is universal on all objects!!!

Caltech is in the process of spending about one billion looking for gravity "waves" that do not exist. If they did exist GR theorizes (in some versions post Einstein) that the waves can be no "speedier" than the speed of light. Certainly, if they were there, they would have been found by now.

Standard Models and GR to the contrary, standard, common, "garden-variety" gravity is a secondary force, rather than a primary force. Actually, I would label it metaphysical and completely discard the concept as current theorists rationalize it!!!

Phenomena, such as what?Several of the most obvious are (and there are more; though, they are also more esoteric): Relative, Hierarchic Compression (http://www.CQthus.com/PT/RHC) (RHC) and Confluent Congruence (http://www.CQthus.com/PT/CC) (CC). Should you have any better thoughts, you should be in line for the next Nobel.