The internal geometry of a Light wave

[Epsilon=One]

The internal geometry of a Light wave

The internal geometry of a Light wave is, heuristically represented by a two-dimensional Brunardot Ellipse (BE) (www.101123.com/BE).

Light "waves" are expanding, dissipating, ellipsoidal structures that are generated; by functions of time and rotation about the major diameter of said, heuristic, Brunardot Ellipse (www.101123.com/101123.com) (BE); from seminal motion (www.101123.com/SM) that manifests as Triquametric motion (www.101123.com/TM) (TM): relativistic, complex oscillating, ellipsoidal structures with internal resonances. The internal resonances which manifest as mass are referred to as Resoloids (www.101123.com/R-loid). Light is the traumatic ejection of said Resoloids (www.101123.com/R-loid).

Only Pulsoid Theory (www.101123.com/PTis) (PT) precisely explains where the almost inexhaustible energy within a light wave originates; which is also the identical locus of the, hitherto, inexplicable energy within the atom.

The light wave is the resultant of the seminal motion (www.101123.com/SM) of the Unified Concept (www.101123.com/UC) (UC), where the geometry of dynamic, emergent separation (www.101123.com/DES) (DES) also establishes: the orthogonal dimensions; The Inverse Square Law (www.101123.com/ISL); fundamental, intrinsic time (www.101123.com/FIT) (FIT); Natural integers (www.101123.com/NI) and their basic arithmetical manipulations that underlie all mathematics such as the Natural function (www.101123.com/NF) NF and it corollaries: the Golden Ratio (www.101123.com/GR), the Brunardot Series (www.com/BS) of which the revised Fibonacci sequence (www.101123.com/rFS) is a sequence; and the Natural prime numbers (www.101123.com/NPN) that are the “yardsticks” of Nature's scale.

http://b.g2d.us/be3o-500.gif

Legend for a Brunardot Ellipse

Line AD = radius = r
Line BA = hypotenuse = h
Line BC = soliton = s
Line BD = wave = w
Line BF = vector = v
Line CA = diagonal radial = d
Line CF = amplitude = a
Line EB = perigee = p
Line ED = apogee = o
Line EF = diameter chord = c
Line EG = major diameter = M
Line FH = minor diameter = L
Line JA = diagonal = D

©Copyright 2005-2008 by Brunardot. All rights reserved.
Terms: PhysicsMathForums.com, Brunardot, and Pulsoid Theory must be cited.
Sorry! This Thread has not been completed.
Please Bookmark and return to this site often.

If there is an immediate need for information,
please e-mail directly at the below "Click" link.

Please note that any private correspondence
may be edited and anonymously posted unless
requested otherwise.

Every effort will be made to expedite a reply
with the requested information.Please ask questions. :)With questions it’s possible to know if
comments are logical and convincing;
or whether clarification is required......http://1.g2d.us/e.gifhttp://7.g2d.us/e.jpghttp://2.g2d.us/e.gifhttp://3.g2d.us/e.gifhttp://4.g2d.us/e.gifhttp://5.g2d.us/e.gif
..........http://6.g2d.us/e.gif
..........If images don’t display, "click" the Refresh Icon.

[ste]

Why should the speed of light vary at all? How could it reach a motionless or infinite speed if absolutes do not exist within Reality? If the speed of light supposedly reaches "infinite" speed, how CAN superluminal (hyper-relativistic) phenomenon ever occur? How does the speed of light relate to the speed of gravity?

[Epsilon=One]

Why should the speed of light vary at all?Because it stops and starts as in reflection. Light, a physical manifestation, is not subject to Einstein's theories.

Einstein knew little of Cosmology when his major theories were proposed. Light's theater is the realm of Cosmology.

Because Light decelerates at the rate of a Conceptual Unit (www.CQthus.com/PT/CU) per pulse, such deceleration is hardly noticeable at the slow speeds of anthropoids.

How could it reach a motionless or infinite speed if absolutes do not exist within Reality?When such speeds are reached there is no existence.

If the speed of light supposedly reaches "infinite" speed, how CAN superluminal (hyper-relativistic) phenomenon ever occur?Yes, there is such phenomena . . . all about us.

Infinite is very large; as, the number system is infinite. Infinite is within Reality (www.CQthus.com/PT/R). Hyper-relativistic is above the limits set by the theories of relativity.

How does the speed of light relate to the speed of gravity?Most effects of "gravity" are secondary effects of first effects that are created by motion, harmony, and resonances. Light is also a secondary effect created by motion, harmony, and resonances.

What is normally defined as the speed of gravity is an infinite speed. One effect of gravity (Cosmological "attraction-at-a-distance") is the speed of quanta compressing quanta.

Standard Model theory does not allow the speed of gravity to exceed Einstein's speed of light. Obviously, if the Standard Model concept of gravity's speed were correct, gravity waves would have been observed long ago. Instead, we waste billions of dollars looking for something that doesn't exist; and, thereby save many jobs.

[DragonTayl]

Because Light decelerates at the rate of a Conceptual Unit (www.CQthus.com/PT/CU) per pulse, such deceleration is hardly noticeable at the slow speeds of anthropoids.

Forgive the tongue-in-cheek title of my first post in these forums. Briefly, I have read the sticky "Pulsoid Theory Is..." and all the links in the glossary provided therein.

I am fascinated.

I do not understand it yet, but I found this forum because I do not believe the speed of light is a constant, and as such do not believe the universe is expanding uniformly. I happen to like Hubble, have been to Mt. Wilson Observatory (used to live very close) and would not want to cross mathematical swords with Einstein (if it were possible anyway). However, there seem to me certain assumptions in their theories I simply could not understand. Perhaps they supported those assumptions, or eliminated my rather simple thoughts, but I have not been able to dig deep enough to find out why.

I hope to post many questions throughout these threads, but I had to start somewhere. I chose here, because it was my entry point into this fascinating theory. I apologize because I am probably a layman. I have taken math “through” calculus, but that was a while ago and I have had no practical use for it since. I have no academic background in quantum or relativity other than my own fascination, reading materials I could find (at my library and on the internet). I do not profess to understand them, either. I recognize the point of these forums was to entice academia to challenge PT, but as they seem to have left this one to us amateurs, hopefully I can do my part.

So, massive (and probably unnecessary) preamble aside, what brought this forum to my attention was my instinctive belief that it is more logical to assume that light decelerates than it is to assume it is constant and that therefore the universe is not only expanding, but that the measurements of that ‘constant’ light give us stars that are older than the so-called “Big Bang”.

(This thread is what showed up in my search, thus the title of my post)

My question is this, is the deceleration of light accounted for through PT, even at only a CU per pulse, enough that across the vast distances between galaxies, light would “slow down” enough to account for red-shift? That what we know as the “Doppler Effect” might be achievable not only by motion relative to a wave, but distance from the source of that wave?

I am also wrestling with the concept of just what IS waving. Is this the dark energy and/or dark matter? Does this suggest that we cannot observe (with current instruments) dark energy or dark matter, but we can observe its/their motion?

I hope I have not so completely missed everything that my questions are beyond answering, and I consider myself extremely fortunate and lucky that my first searching for this subject came only days after a big flurry of activity from user “STE”. If it weren’t for STE’s questions, I might never have found this place. I can’t agree with Epsilon=One more on the importance of having people ask questions. It is through our questions that E=O generates not only more ‘searchable’ text, but perhaps the very phrases that will attract more thinkers yearning for a better explanation of what is.

[ste]

Hello, and welcome to these forums DragonTayl! I am glad that my questions have finally served a purpose for someone other than myself, and I welcome the companionship of someone asking questions besides me! ;)

The truth is, that the questions are driven by an insatiable curiosity, one that I've not been able to control very much as of late.

I believe that there is much unity which an understanding of Pulsoid Theory could bring to understanding our universe, or Reality. Unfortunately, it seems that scientific efforts of some of our greatest minds have been hampered by illogical conclusions and the unwillingness to think beyond the accepted "line" which is drawn by others. If nothing else, the process of evaluating alternative theories such as this one will at least help us realize how flawed and misconstrued a picture can be drawn with faulty reasoning. The process for evaluating of a concept must be in accordance with IPSO (physicsmathforums.com/showthread.php?t=142) (as you will learn in Pulsoid theory).

If academia will ignore it, we can, as you have said, do our part. In fact, pulsoid theory was written for us, not physics majors. It is meant to show that anybody with a pencil, paper, and a common PC can understand the universe better than any living theoretical physicist is willing to. An advanced knowledge of science is not required. High-school algebra helps too, but even that isn't required for a basic understanding of the processes.

You will notice that many of these pulsoid theory posts are not always arranged in the most logical order, which Epsilon contends is intentional. The reasoning behind this it to get people to ask questions so that a better understanding is reached (if I understand him correctly).

One technique which will probably help is the reading of a post once or twice, and then leaving it to boil over in your mind while waiting in an elevator or walking down the street. And then later, to return and re-evaluate what you have taken in and possibly seeing things come together more. There will always be more to absorb, which is why I keep asking questions.

The more questions you ask, the clearer a concept will become for not only you, but anyone who chances to read the post (such as the manner in which you found these forums). So I encourage you to keep asking questions and invite others to do so as well!

With a little patience and minimal curiosity, you'll see that just a few simple questions can help you see a view of Reality that you will not find within the halls of academia.